=== 搜索历史zod损坏记录 ===
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-15.md:- 根因版本号搞错: 说zod@4.3.6损坏，实际是zod@4.4.3/core.js缺失
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-16_zod_click_模块损坏根因分析.md:# 2026-05-16 CTO事件记录：zod模块第三次损坏 + Python venv损坏
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:| 5月14日 | 03:00:55 | 03:01:09 | ❌ zod损坏 |
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:| 5月17日 | 03:00:36 | 03:01:08 | ❌ zod损坏 |
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-18.md:| 网关重启 | ⏭ 跳过 | 按要求不重启, 避免zod模块损坏 |

=== 搜索memory中模块损坏的模式 ===
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-04-11-heartbeat-check.md:Since the file is empty (only contains template/instructions), there are no tasks for me to perform. The template explicitly says to keep the file empty to skip heartbeat API calls.
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-04-11-heartbeat-check.md:Since  file is essentially empty (only contains template/instructions), there are no actual tasks for me to perform. The template explicitly says to keep the file empty to skip heartbeat API calls.
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-04-11-heartbeat-check.md:Since  file is essentially empty (only contains template/instructions), there are no actual tasks for me to perform. The template explicitly says to keep the file empty to skip heartbeat API calls.
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-07_CTO_文件处理中断解决.md:- ✅ **根本原因已解决**：磁盘空间压力和文件数量问题
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-14_health_check.md:1. **8001端口宕机** → 已恢复。原因: 8001 venv的click模块损坏(ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'click.core')，使用8000端口的venv启动成功
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-16_zod_click_模块损坏根因分析.md:# 2026-05-16 CTO事件记录：zod模块第三次损坏 + Python venv损坏
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-16_zod_click_模块损坏根因分析.md:- 13:15 - 发现Python venv也损坏（29个空.py文件）
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-16_zod_click_模块损坏根因分析.md:- Node.js(pnpm)和Python(venv)同时出现模块损坏
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-16_zod_click_模块损坏根因分析.md:- 29个空.py文件分布在click、pip、certifi等包中
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:- 端口8000未监听 ❌ → manhua-studio-8000服务崩溃，venv中click.core模块损坏

=== pnpm store的完整性 ===
Store位置: /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10
0
空core.js文件数(store中)
0
空.js文件数(store中)

=== 检查当前pnpm目录中的空文件 ===
20
空.js文件数(pnpm目录中)
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-builder@1.2.0/node_modules/fast-xml-builder/src/prettifyJs2Xml.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-parser@5.7.3/node_modules/fast-xml-parser/src/v6/Report.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/index.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/jsx/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/jsx/intrinsic-elements.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/validator/utils.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/middleware/secure-headers/permissions-policy.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/headers.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/http-status.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/client/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/deno/deno.d.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/aws-lambda/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/service-worker/types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/cjs/adapter/deno/deno.d.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/node-domexception@1.0.0/node_modules/node-domexception/.history/test_20210527205603.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/node-domexception@1.0.0/node_modules/node-domexception/.history/index_20210527203842.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@octokit+plugin-rest-endpoint-methods@13.3.2-cjs.1_@octokit+core@5.2.2/node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/dist-src/generated/parameters-and-response-types.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@octokit+plugin-rest-endpoint-methods@13.3.2-cjs.1_@octokit+core@5.2.2/node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/dist-src/generated/method-types.js


exec

# 关键发现！
# 1. pnpm store中0个空文件 → store是完整的
# 2. pnpm目录中20个空文件 → 这些是hardlink指向store的，但inode显示Links=2
# 这意味着：store中的文件是完好的，但pnpm目录中的文件变成了0字节

# 检查这些空文件的硬链接情况
echo "=== 空文件的inode和硬链接数 ==="
for f in $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | head -5); do
    inode=$(stat -c %i "$f")
    links=$(stat -c %h "$f")
    size=$(stat -c %s "$f")
    echo "  inode=$inode links=$links size=$size $f"
done

echo -e "\n=== 检查store中对应inode的文件 ==="
# 如果store中的文件也是0字节，说明是store层面损坏
# 如果store中正常，说明是hardlink被断开重写为0字节
for f in $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | head -3); do
    inode=$(stat -c %i "$f")
    echo "File: $f"
    echo "  Inode: $inode"
    # 在store中查找同inode的文件
    find /root/.local/share/pnpm/store -inum "$inode" 2>/dev/null | while read store_f; do
        store_size=$(stat -c %s "$store_f")
        echo "  Store file: $store_f (size=$store_size)"
    done
    # 查找硬链接数
    nlinks=$(stat -c %h "$f")
    echo "  Hard links: $nlinks"
done

echo -e "\n=== zod损坏的历史模式 ==="
echo "5月14日03:00 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间"
echo "5月17日03:00 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间"
echo "5月21日03:08 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间"
echo ""
echo "关键模式：**每次都在凌晨3点附近**"


=== 空文件的inode和硬链接数 ===
  inode=797380 links=24 size=0 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-builder@1.2.0/node_modules/fast-xml-builder/src/prettifyJs2Xml.js
  inode=797380 links=24 size=0 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-parser@5.7.3/node_modules/fast-xml-parser/src/v6/Report.js
  inode=797380 links=24 size=0 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/types.js
  inode=797380 links=24 size=0 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/index.js
  inode=797380 links=24 size=0 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/jsx/types.js

=== 检查store中对应inode的文件 ===
File: /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-builder@1.2.0/node_modules/fast-xml-builder/src/prettifyJs2Xml.js
  Inode: 797380
  Store file: /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files/cf/83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e (size=0)
  Hard links: 24
File: /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-parser@5.7.3/node_modules/fast-xml-parser/src/v6/Report.js
  Inode: 797380
  Store file: /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files/cf/83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e (size=0)
  Hard links: 24
File: /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/types.js
  Inode: 797380
  Store file: /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files/cf/83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e (size=0)
  Hard links: 24

=== zod损坏的历史模式 ===
5月14日03:00 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间
5月17日03:00 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间
5月21日03:08 zod损坏 - 凌晨维护时间

关键模式：**每次都在凌晨3点附近**


# 🔥🔥🔥 重大发现！
# 所有20个空文件共享同一个inode(797380)，Links=24
# 这意味着它们是同一个文件的硬链接！
# 而且store中的对应文件也是0字节！

# 这不是随机的文件损坏，而是同一个inode被截断为0字节
# 24个不同的.js文件(不同的内容)竟然共享同一个inode？
# 这完全不合理 —— 除非pnpm store在hardlink模式下出了严重问题

echo "=== 所有20个空文件的inode ==="
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | while read f; do
    inode=$(stat -c %i "$f")
    echo "  inode=$inode $f"
done | sort

echo -e "\n=== 检查：这20个文件内容是否应该不同？==="
# 如果它们都指向同一个store文件，那意味着pnpm的content-addressable storage
# 错误地把不同内容的文件映射到了同一个hash

echo "Store文件名（即content hash）:"
store_file=$(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/store -inum 797380 2>/dev/null | head -1)
echo "  $store_file"
echo "  size=$(stat -c %s "$store_file" 2>/dev/null)"

echo -e "\n=== pnpm store status ==="
pnpm store status 2>&1 | head -20

echo -e "\n=== 当前zod/ajv文件的inode（对比正常的）==="
stat /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js 2>/dev/null | grep -E "Inode|Links|Size"
stat /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js 2>/dev/null | grep -E "Inode|Links|Size"


=== 所有20个空文件的inode ===
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-builder@1.2.0/node_modules/fast-xml-builder/src/prettifyJs2Xml.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/fast-xml-parser@5.7.3/node_modules/fast-xml-parser/src/v6/Report.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/aws-lambda/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/deno/deno.d.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/adapter/service-worker/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/cjs/adapter/deno/deno.d.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/client/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/index.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/helper/conninfo/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/jsx/intrinsic-elements.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/jsx/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/middleware/secure-headers/permissions-policy.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/headers.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/http-status.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/utils/types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/hono@4.12.21/node_modules/hono/dist/validator/utils.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/node-domexception@1.0.0/node_modules/node-domexception/.history/index_20210527203842.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/node-domexception@1.0.0/node_modules/node-domexception/.history/test_20210527205603.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@octokit+plugin-rest-endpoint-methods@13.3.2-cjs.1_@octokit+core@5.2.2/node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/dist-src/generated/method-types.js
  inode=797380 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@octokit+plugin-rest-endpoint-methods@13.3.2-cjs.1_@octokit+core@5.2.2/node_modules/@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods/dist-src/generated/parameters-and-response-types.js

=== 检查：这20个文件内容是否应该不同？===
Store文件名（即content hash）:
  /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files/cf/83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e
  size=0

=== pnpm store status ===
Packages in the store are untouched

=== 当前zod/ajv文件的inode（对比正常的）===
  Size: 2578      	Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 253,2	Inode: 825188      Links: 2
  Size: 25202     	Blocks: 56         IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 253,2	Inode: 800866      Links: 2


This is a CRITICAL finding! Let me analyze what's happening:

1. 20 empty `.js` files all share the same inode (797380) with Links=24
2. The store file for this inode is also 0 bytes
3. These are different files from different packages (hono, fast-xml-parser, octokit, node-domexception) that should have DIFFERENT content
4. But they're all hardlinked to the same store file (same content hash)

This means pnpm's content-addressable store has a hash collision or corruption where multiple unrelated files got mapped to the same hash. The store file is 0 bytes — meaning whatever process truncated this file, it took out ALL 24 hardlinks at once (since they share the inode).

Wait, actually let me think more carefully. In pnpm's content-addressable store:
- Each file's content is hashed
- Files with the same hash share one store entry
- hardlink means the store entry and all package files point to the same inode

If 20 different .js files (with different intended content) all point to the same store hash, that means one of:
1. pnpm incorrectly computed the same hash for different files (hash collision - extremely unlikely with SHA-512)
2. The files were already 0 bytes when pnpm installed them (so they all have the same "empty" content hash)
3. Something truncated the store file to 0 bytes AFTER installation, and since all hardlinks share the inode, they all became 0 bytes

Option 3 seems most likely. The store file at `cf/83e1357...` was truncated to 0 bytes. Since all 24 hardlinks point to the same inode, they all became 0 bytes simultaneously.

But wait - the store says `pnpm store status` reports "untouched". That might just mean the metadata/timestamps match, not that the content is correct.

The key question: what truncated the store file? Possible causes:
1. `drop_caches` + page cache invalidation before write completed
2. Disk space pressure causing write failures
3. A process truncating files (unlikely)
4. Filesystem corruption

Now, the zod/ajv files are currently OK (Links=2, normal size). Those were reinstalled by the Tencent AI fix. The 20 empty files are leftover from a previous corruption event.

But the PATTERN is clear:
- Every zod corruption happened around 3 AM
- The maintenance cron runs at 3 AM
- The maintenance script runs `optimize_system_performance.sh` which used to do `drop_caches`

Let me check when the `package-import-method` was changed from `copy` to `hardlink`.

Actually, looking more carefully at the current state:
- Current zod/ajv: Links=2, healthy (reinstalled today)
- The 20 empty files: inode=797380, Links=24, all 0 bytes (leftover from earlier corruption)
- These 20 files are all from packages installed with the OLD copy mode (before 5/17)

Wait no - if they share the same inode with Links=24, they ARE hardlinks. But different content files can't have the same content hash... unless they're all truly empty (0 bytes) and pnpm stored empty file once.

Actually that's exactly it! When pnpm creates a hardlink, it:
1. Computes content hash of the source file
2. Stores the file in `store/v10/files/<hash>`
3. Creates hardlinks from package dirs to the store file

If the original files were 0 bytes at the time of installation (because they were already corrupted), they would all hash to the same value (empty file → same hash). OR, if a single store file got truncated to 0 bytes after installation, ALL hardlinks to that inode would simultaneously become 0 bytes.

But 20 different .js files from different packages can't all have the same content... So the truncation theory makes more sense.

Wait, but then they wouldn't all have the same inode. Unless... pnpm uses some kind of deduplication that maps multiple files to one inode?

Actually, I think I misread the data. Let me reconsider. All 20 files have inode 797380 and 24 links. That means:
- There are 24 total hardlinks to this inode
- 20 of them are the empty .js files we found
- 4 more links could be in the store or other package dirs
- The store file is one of those 24 links

But different .js files with different content shouldn't share the same inode. This is only possible if:
1. They were all empty when created → same content hash → same store entry → same inode
2. The filesystem has corruption causing inode reuse

Theory 1 seems most likely: these files were already 0 bytes before pnpm created the hardlinks. The corruption happened BEFORE or DURING the `pnpm install` process. pnpm computed the hash of the 0-byte file, stored it, and all 20 empty files became hardlinks to the same store entry.

But when were these files installed? The Tencent AI did `pnpm install -g openclaw@latest --force` which would have reinstalled everything. If the files were corrupted on disk before the reinstall, and pnpm read the corrupted (empty) files during its install process, it would create a new store entry with the empty content hash.

Actually wait - `pnpm install -g openclaw@latest --force` downloads fresh packages from the registry. It doesn't read local files. So the store should have been populated from the registry, and the files should be correct.

Unless... the `--force` flag on `pnpm install -g` with `package-import-method=hardlink` does something weird. Like, if the store already has an entry for a file hash, it uses the existing store entry without re-downloading. And if that existing store entry was already corrupted (0 bytes), pnpm would happily create hardlinks to the corrupted store entry.

This is the key insight! Here's the corruption chain:
1. Some event (drop_caches, disk IO error, etc.) truncates a store file to 0 bytes
2. pnpm install sees the store has an entry for this hash, uses it
3. All hardlinks to this store file become 0 bytes
4. Multiple packages that happen to share any 0-byte store entry all get corrupted simultaneously

But that still doesn't explain why 20 DIFFERENT files all have the SAME inode. They should have different content hashes...

Unless they were all originally empty files in their npm packages. Some packages ship with empty placeholder .js files. If 20 packages all have empty .js files, they would all hash to the same value and share one store entry.

Let me check - are there actually 24 links to this inode, with 4 more being in other packages?

Actually, let me count: the store file itself is one link, plus the 20 empty .js files we found = 21. There should be 3 more links somewhere.

OK, the key question for the user is: **why does zod keep getting corrupted, specifically around 3 AM?**

Looking at the pattern:
- 5/14 03:00 zod corrupted
- 5/17 03:00 zod corrupted
- 5/21 03:08 zod corrupted

And the 3 AM maintenance cron runs at this time. Let me check what that cron task does specifically that could cause file corruption.

Actually, the current zod/ajv are healthy (Links=2, normal size) because they were reinstalled today. The 20 empty files are from a PREVIOUS corruption event.

Let me focus on what's most useful: understanding why files become 0 bytes, and preventing it.

Let me also check the child process SIGTERM question - that's the second technical question the user asked.

# 🔥 重大发现！20个空文件共享同一个inode(797380)
# 这意味着它们是同一内容的硬链接
# 可能的原因：这些文件在pnpm install时就已经是0字节（因为store文件被截断）

# 问题2：网关子进程为什么被SIGTERM杀掉？

echo "=== 2.1 OpenClaw网关的cgroup配置 ==="
systemctl --user cat openclaw-gateway.service 2>/dev/null | head -30

echo -e "\n=== 2.2 网关的KillMode配置 ==="
systemctl --user show openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null | grep -iE "KillMode|KillSignal|SendSIGKILL|FinalKillSignal|TimeoutStopSec"

echo -e "\n=== 2.3 验证：cron任务通过什么进程树运行 ==="
# OpenClaw cron job → agentTurn → exec tool → shell command
# 进程树: openclaw-gateway → node → agent session → exec (child process)
# 当systemctl stop网关时，systemd向cgroup中所有进程发送SIGTERM

echo "=== 2.4 检查当前网关的cgroup进程 ==="
systemctl --user status openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null | grep -E "CGroup|├|└|Main PID"


=== 2.1 OpenClaw网关的cgroup配置 ===
# /root/.config/systemd/user/openclaw-gateway.service
[Unit]
Description=OpenClaw Gateway (v2026.5.19)
After=network-online.target
Wants=network-online.target
StartLimitBurst=5
StartLimitIntervalSec=60

[Service]
ExecStart=/usr/bin/node /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openclaw/dist/index.js gateway --port 27038
Restart=always
RestartSec=5
RestartPreventExitStatus=78
TimeoutStopSec=30
TimeoutStartSec=30
SuccessExitStatus=0 143
KillMode=control-group
Environment=HOME=/root
Environment=TMPDIR=/tmp
Environment=NODE_EXTRA_CA_CERTS=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
Environment=PATH=/usr/bin:/root/.local/share/pnpm:/root/.nvm/current/bin:/root/.local/bin:/root/.npm-global/bin:/root/bin:/root/.nix-profile/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/root/.bun/bin
Environment=OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_PORT=27038
Environment=OPENCLAW_SYSTEMD_UNIT=openclaw-gateway.service
Environment="OPENCLAW_WINDOWS_TASK_NAME=OpenClaw Gateway"
Environment=OPENCLAW_SERVICE_MARKER=openclaw
Environment=OPENCLAW_SERVICE_KIND=gateway
Environment=OPENCLAW_SERVICE_VERSION=2026.5.19

[Install]
WantedBy=default.target

=== 2.2 网关的KillMode配置 ===
KillMode=control-group
KillSignal=15
RestartKillSignal=15
FinalKillSignal=9
SendSIGKILL=yes
SurviveFinalKillSignal=no

=== 2.3 验证：cron任务通过什么进程树运行 ===
=== 2.4 检查当前网关的cgroup进程 ===
   Main PID: 2896261 (node)
     CGroup: /user.slice/user-0.slice/user@0.service/app.slice/openclaw-gateway.service
             ├─2896261 /usr/bin/node /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openclaw/dist/index.js gateway --port 27038
             ├─2928280 /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -c "# 🔥 重大发现！20个空文件共享同一个inode(797380)\n# 这意味着它们是同一内容的硬链接\n# 可能的原因：这些文件在pnpm install时就已经是0字节（因为store文件被截断）\n\n# 问题2：网关子进程为什么被SIGTERM杀掉？\n\necho \"=== 2.1 OpenClaw网关的cgroup配置 ===\"\nsystemctl --user cat openclaw-gateway.service 2>/dev/null | head -30\n\necho -e \"\\n=== 2.2 网关的KillMode配置 ===\"\nsystemctl --user show openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null | grep -iE \"KillMode|KillSignal|SendSIGKILL|FinalKillSignal|TimeoutStopSec\"\n\necho -e \"\\n=== 2.3 验证：cron任务通过什么进程树运行 ===\"\n# OpenClaw cron job → agentTurn → exec tool → shell command\n# 进程树: openclaw-gateway → node → agent session → exec (child process)\n# 当systemctl stop网关时，systemd向cgroup中所有进程发送SIGTERM\n\necho \"=== 2.4 检查当前网关的cgroup进程 ===\"\nsystemctl --user status openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null | grep -E \"CGroup|├|└|Main PID\""
             ├─2928285 systemctl --user status openclaw-gateway
             └─2928286 grep -E "CGroup|├|└|Main PID"


**确认了**。`KillMode=control-group` 意味着 `systemctl stop` 会向整个cgroup发送SIGTERM，包括当前我正在执行的命令。这就是为什么zod_healthcheck.sh的`systemctl stop`会杀掉自己。

# === 问题2 确认 ===
# KillMode=control-group: systemctl stop向cgroup内所有进程发SIGTERM
# zod_healthcheck.sh是网关子进程(cgroup内)，所以stop网关时自己也死了
# systemd-run会创建独立cgroup，不受网关cgroup的SIGTERM影响

# === 回到问题1：zod为什么反复损坏？===
# 核心线索：
# 1. 每次都凌晨3点附近
# 2. 20个空文件共享同一个inode(797380)，store中该文件也是0字节
# 3. pnpm store status说"untouched" — pnpm认为store正常
# 4. zod/ajv当前正常(重装后)，但hono等20个文件仍是0字节

echo "=== 深入分析：inode 797380 的24个硬链接 ==="
echo "这20个空文件来自不同包(hono, fast-xml-parser, node-domexception, octokit)"
echo "它们共享同一个inode，在pnpm content-addressable store中指向同一个hash"
echo ""
echo "pnpm hardlink模式的工作原理："
echo "1. 安装时，pnpm计算文件内容的SHA512 hash"
echo "2. 相同内容的文件共享同一个store文件(硬链接)"
echo "3. 如果两个不同的文件计算出相同的hash(不可能)或store损坏，就会出问题"
echo ""
echo "但这20个文件内容完全不同，不可能有相同的hash"
echo "唯一的解释：store文件被截断为0字节后，某个操作让新安装的文件也指向了这个损坏的store文件"

echo -e "\n=== 检查store文件的hash ==="
store_file="/root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files/cf/83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e"
echo "Store file: $(basename $store_file)"
echo "Size: $(stat -c %s "$store_file" 2>/dev/null)"
echo "Links: $(stat -c %h "$store_file" 2>/dev/null)"

echo -e "\n=== 这个hash对应什么内容？==="
# pnpm store v10的文件名格式是SHA512的hex编码
# 文件大小为0，所以hash应该是空字符串的SHA512
echo "空文件(0字节)的SHA512:"
echo -n "" | sha512sum | cut -d' ' -f1
echo ""
echo "Store文件名中的hash:"
basename "$store_file" | cut -c1-128

echo -e "\n=== 对比hash ==="
empty_hash=$(echo -n "" | sha512sum | cut -d' ' -f1)
store_hash=$(basename "$store_file" | cut -c1-128)
if [ "$empty_hash" = "$store_hash" ]; then
    echo "✅ 匹配！Store文件确实是空内容(0字节)的SHA512"
    echo "这意味着pnpm在安装时，某些文件的内容被读为空"
else
    echo "❌ 不匹配！Store文件名和内容不一致"
    echo "  空内容hash: $empty_hash"
    echo "  Store文件名: $store_hash"
fi


=== 深入分析：inode 797380 的24个硬链接 ===
这20个空文件来自不同包(hono, fast-xml-parser, node-domexception, octokit)
它们共享同一个inode，在pnpm content-addressable store中指向同一个hash

pnpm hardlink模式的工作原理：
1. 安装时，pnpm计算文件内容的SHA512 hash
2. 相同内容的文件共享同一个store文件(硬链接)
3. 如果两个不同的文件计算出相同的hash(不可能)或store损坏，就会出问题

但这20个文件内容完全不同，不可能有相同的hash
唯一的解释：store文件被截断为0字节后，某个操作让新安装的文件也指向了这个损坏的store文件

=== 检查store文件的hash ===
Store file: 83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e
Size: 0
Links: 24

=== 这个hash对应什么内容？===
空文件(0字节)的SHA512:
cf83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e

Store文件名中的hash:
83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e

=== 对比hash ===
❌ 不匹配！Store文件名和内容不一致
  空内容hash: cf83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e
  Store文件名: 83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e


# 等一下！仔细看——store文件路径是 /store/v10/files/cf/83e1357...
# pnpm store v10的文件路径结构是: files/{前2位hash}/{完整hash}
# 所以文件名是 "83e1357..." 而目录名是 "cf"
# 完整的hash应该是 "cf83e1357..." (目录名+文件名)

echo "=== 重新计算：pnpm store v10的文件路径格式 ==="
echo "路径: files/cf/83e1357..."
echo "pnpm store v10格式: files/{hash前2位}/{hash剩余部分}"
echo "完整hash: cf83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e"
echo ""
echo "空文件(0字节)的SHA512:"
echo -n "" | sha512sum
echo ""
echo "✅ 完全匹配！"
echo ""
echo "这意味着：pnpm store中有一个文件，其hash是空内容的SHA512"
echo "20个不同的.js文件在安装时被硬链接到了这个空文件"
echo ""
echo "这怎么可能？——只有一种情况：这些文件在pnpm install时就已经是0字节"
echo "也就是说，在10:27腾讯云AI执行pnpm install时，"
echo "某些源文件读到了空内容(或写入时被截断)"

echo -e "\n=== 但更重要的发现：这些空文件是否影响网关？==="
echo "检查hono等包是否被网关加载..."
echo ""
# hono是openclaw的依赖吗？
grep -r "hono" /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openclaw/package.json 2>/dev/null | head -3
# fast-xml-parser?
grep -r "fast-xml-parser" /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openclaw/package.json 2>/dev/null | head -3


=== 重新计算：pnpm store v10的文件路径格式 ===
路径: files/cf/83e1357...
pnpm store v10格式: files/{hash前2位}/{hash剩余部分}
完整hash: cf83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e

空文件(0字节)的SHA512:
cf83e1357eefb8bdf1542850d66d8007d620e4050b5715dc83f4a921d36ce9ce47d0d13c5d85f2b0ff8318d2877eec2f63b931bd47417a81a538327af927da3e  -

✅ 完全匹配！

这意味着：pnpm store中有一个文件，其hash是空内容的SHA512
20个不同的.js文件在安装时被硬链接到了这个空文件

这怎么可能？——只有一种情况：这些文件在pnpm install时就已经是0字节
也就是说，在10:27腾讯云AI执行pnpm install时，
某些源文件读到了空内容(或写入时被截断)

=== 但更重要的发现：这些空文件是否影响网关？===
检查hono等包是否被网关加载...


# 检查这些空文件包是否是openclaw的依赖
echo "=== openclaw的依赖中是否有hono/fast-xml-parser ==="
cat /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/node_modules/openclaw/package.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
d = json.load(sys.stdin)
deps = {**d.get('dependencies', {}), **d.get('optionalDependencies', {})}
for name in ['hono', 'fast-xml-parser', 'fast-xml-builder', 'node-domexception', '@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods']:
    if name in deps:
        print(f'  ✅ {name}: {deps[name]}')
    else:
        print(f'  ❌ {name}: 不是直接依赖')
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 关键问题：这20个空文件是今天(5月21日)重装时产生的，还是之前就有的？==="
# 检查文件创建时间
for f in $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | head -3); do
    stat "$f" | grep -E "Birth|Change|Modify"
    echo "---"
done

echo -e "\n=== zod损坏的历史：每次都在凌晨3点，是什么触发了文件截断？==="
echo "检查5月14日和5月17日的凌晨维护任务是否执行了drop_caches"
grep -r "drop_caches\|echo 3.*proc" /root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-1[4-8]*.md 2>/dev/null | head -5

echo -e "\n=== 检查当前cron中的凌晨维护任务配置 ==="
# 凌晨统一维护任务
cat /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
jobs = json.load(sys.stdin)
for j in jobs:
    if isinstance(j, dict):
        name = j.get('name', '')
        if '维护' in name or 'nightly' in name.lower() or '凌晨' in name:
            print(f'Name: {name}')
            print(f'Schedule: {j.get(\"schedule\", {})}')
            msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')[:500]
            print(f'Message: {msg}')
            print()
" 2>/dev/null


=== openclaw的依赖中是否有hono/fast-xml-parser ===
  ❌ hono: 不是直接依赖
  ❌ fast-xml-parser: 不是直接依赖
  ❌ fast-xml-builder: 不是直接依赖
  ❌ node-domexception: 不是直接依赖
  ❌ @octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods: 不是直接依赖

=== 关键问题：这20个空文件是今天(5月21日)重装时产生的，还是之前就有的？===
Modify: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
Change: 2026-05-21 10:22:52.351375833 +0800
 Birth: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
---
Modify: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
Change: 2026-05-21 10:22:52.351375833 +0800
 Birth: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
---
Modify: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
Change: 2026-05-21 10:22:52.351375833 +0800
 Birth: 2026-05-17 09:16:02.176486529 +0800
---

=== zod损坏的历史：每次都在凌晨3点，是什么触发了文件截断？===
检查5月14日和5月17日的凌晨维护任务是否执行了drop_caches
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:2. **维护脚本** `cleanup_system_logs.sh` 第4步执行 `echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches` 清空Linux页面缓存
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:4. **组合效果**: drop_caches清空缓存 → 网关重启冷启动 → 冷启动大量读取pnpm文件 → I/O竞争导致zod/core.js等模块加载失败
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:| 日期 | drop_caches | SIGTERM | 结果 |
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:1. ✅ 3个脚本禁用drop_caches (cleanup_system_logs.sh, optimize_memory.sh, optimize_system_performance.sh)
/root/.openclaw/workspace/memory/2026-05-17.md:2. **不要执行drop_caches: 3** — 在pnpm copy模式下会破坏文件缓存

=== 检查当前cron中的凌晨维护任务配置 ===


# 关键发现！
# 1. 20个空文件Birth时间全是5月17日09:16 - 这是5月17日重装时产生的
# 2. Change时间是5月21日10:22 - 这是腾讯云AI重装时inode变更
# 3. 这些空文件是5月17日那次重装时pnpm store损坏的遗留
# 4. zod/ajv当前正常(Last重装恢复了)，但hono等仍为空(不影响网关运行)

# 现在关键问题：5月21日03:08的zod损坏，是什么导致的？
# drop_caches已在5月17日禁用，为什么zod还会损坏？

echo "=== 5月21日凌晨3:00-3:08发生了什么？重新审视 ==="
echo ""
echo "时间线(CST):"
echo "03:00 - BOOT检查: zod:OK, ajv:OK ✅"
echo "03:00 - 凌晨维护任务开始(main agent)"
echo "03:01 - 清理系统日志"
echo "03:02 - 清理旧报告"
echo "03:02 - coredump清理(后台)"
echo "03:05 - 中断恢复测试数据清理"
echo "03:05 - update_plan失败(多个in_progress步骤)"
echo "03:06 - 备份系统配置"
echo "03:06 - 优化系统性能(drop_caches已禁用)"
echo "03:07 - 清理残留进程(pkill -f 'sleep 300')"
echo "03:08 - zod健康检查发现zod损坏 ❌"
echo ""
echo "问题：03:00-03:08之间什么操作可能损坏zod？"

echo -e "\n=== 检查凌晨维护任务的详细操作 ==="
# 重新看main agent的维护任务
grep "2026-05-20T19:0[0-5]" /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/27fca668-a55a-46bf-bece-cb1eb012b8d5.jsonl 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
for line in sys.stdin:
    try:
        d = json.loads(line.strip())
        ts = d.get('timestamp', '')
        msg = d.get('message', {})
        role = msg.get('role', '')
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        for c in content:
            if c.get('type') == 'toolCall':
                tool = c.get('name', '')
                args = c.get('arguments', {})
                if isinstance(args, dict):
                    cmd = str(args.get('command', ''))[:500]
                else:
                    cmd = str(args)[:500]
                if cmd:
                    print(f'{ts} [{role}] {tool}: {cmd}')
    except:
        pass
" 2>/dev/null


=== 5月21日凌晨3:00-3:08发生了什么？重新审视 ===

时间线(CST):
03:00 - BOOT检查: zod:OK, ajv:OK ✅
03:00 - 凌晨维护任务开始(main agent)
03:01 - 清理系统日志
03:02 - 清理旧报告
03:02 - coredump清理(后台)
03:05 - 中断恢复测试数据清理
03:05 - update_plan失败(多个in_progress步骤)
03:06 - 备份系统配置
03:06 - 优化系统性能(drop_caches已禁用)
03:07 - 清理残留进程(pkill -f 'sleep 300')
03:08 - zod健康检查发现zod损坏 ❌

问题：03:00-03:08之间什么操作可能损坏zod？

=== 检查凌晨维护任务的详细操作 ===
2026-05-20T19:01:39.873Z [assistant] exec: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete 2>&1; echo "日志清理完成（退出码：$?）"
2026-05-20T19:02:04.394Z [assistant] exec: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete 2>&1; echo "旧报告清理完成（退出码：$?）"
2026-05-20T19:02:45.737Z [assistant] exec: find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null; echo "coredump清理完成"
2026-05-20T19:05:09.960Z [assistant] exec: if [ -f /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh ]; then /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup 2>&1; echo "中断恢复测试数据清理完成（退出码：$?）"; else echo "脚本不存在，跳过"; fi


# coredump清理: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`
# 这个命令搜索整个根目录！可能匹配到pnpm目录中的文件？
# 检查pnpm目录中是否有以"core."开头的文件

echo "=== 检查pnpm目录中的core.*文件 ==="
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.*" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo -e "\n=== zod的core.js路径 ==="
ls -la /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.* 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== ajv的core.js路径 ==="
ls -la /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.* 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 其他core.*文件(可能被误删) ==="
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.js" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -10
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.cjs" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -10
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.d.ts" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -10


=== 检查pnpm目录中的core.*文件 ===
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/strtok3@10.3.5/node_modules/strtok3/lib/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/strtok3@10.3.5/node_modules/strtok3/lib/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/src/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/refs/json-schema-2019-09/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/refs/json-schema-2020-12/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js.map
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/refs/json-schema-2019-09/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/refs/json-schema-2020-12/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/core.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/src/v4/core/core.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.cts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.cjs
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/highlight.js@10.7.3/node_modules/highlight.js/lib/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@mistralai+mistralai@2.2.1/node_modules/@mistralai/mistralai/src/core.ts

=== zod的core.js路径 ===
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2850 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.cjs
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2252 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.cts
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2249 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.ts
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2578 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js

=== ajv的core.js路径 ===
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root  8325 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.d.ts
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 25202 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js
-rw-r--r-- 2 root root 21608 May 17 09:16 /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js.map

=== 其他core.*文件(可能被误删) ===
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/strtok3@10.3.5/node_modules/strtok3/lib/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/highlight.js@10.7.3/node_modules/highlight.js/lib/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@mistralai+mistralai@2.2.1/node_modules/@mistralai/mistralai/esm/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.cjs
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/strtok3@10.3.5/node_modules/strtok3/lib/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/src/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/@mistralai+mistralai@2.2.1/node_modules/@mistralai/mistralai/esm/core.d.ts


Wait a minute! The coredump cleanup command was:
```
find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete
```

This would match ANY file named "core.*" - including `core.js`, `core.cjs`, `core.d.ts`, etc.!

The zod path is: `/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js`

The glob `core.*` would match `core.js`, `core.cjs`, `core.d.ts`, `core.d.cts`!

And the ajv path is: `/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js`

The glob `core.*` would also match `core.js`, `core.d.ts`, `core.js.map`!

This is the smoking gun! The coredump cleanup command `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` is deleting ALL files named `core.*` across the entire filesystem, including pnpm module files like `zod/v4/core/core.js` and `ajv/dist/core.js`!

That's why:
1. zod keeps getting corrupted at 3 AM - the coredump cleanup runs at 3 AM
2. The pattern is always "core.js missing" - because `find / -name "core.*"` matches `core.js`
3. After 5/17 reinstall, the files were restored, but then the next coredump cleanup at 3 AM would delete them again

This is the root cause! The `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` command is too broad - it matches any file named "core.something", not just coredump files.

Coredump files are typically named "core" (no extension) or "core.PID". The pattern `core.*` is wrong for coredump cleanup - it should be something like `core` or `core.[0-9]*`.

This also explains why the 20 empty files exist - they might be remnants of a different corruption pattern (the store file being 0 bytes), but the zod/ajv corruption is specifically caused by the `core.*` delete pattern.

Wait, let me reconsider. The 20 empty files in the store all have the same inode which is the hash for empty content. That's a different issue - those are likely from a previous pnpm install where some files were already 0 bytes (perhaps from the 5/17 drop_caches incident).

But the zod/ajv corruption pattern is different - the files are being DELETED, not truncated to 0 bytes. The `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` command would delete them entirely.

Actually, let me re-check. The zod healthcheck at 3:08 found zod was corrupted (missing or empty). The 3:00 BOOT check found zod:OK. The coredump cleanup ran at 3:02. So the timeline matches:
- 3:00 - zod OK
- 3:02 - coredump cleanup: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` → deletes zod/v4/core/core.js and ajv/dist/core.js
- 3:08 - zod healthcheck: zod corrupted!

But wait, the current zod/ajv files exist (we checked them and they're OK). That's because they were reinstalled at 10:27.

But hold on - the zod healthcheck checks for `-s "$ZOD_PATH"` which means file exists AND has size > 0. If `find -delete` removes the file entirely, the check would be "file doesn't exist" not "file is empty". The healthcheck output said "zod模块损坏" which is consistent with either condition.

Actually, I need to be more careful. The `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` command:
- `core.*` matches filenames like `core.js`, `core.cjs`, `core.d.ts`, `core.js.map`, etc.
- It would delete ALL `core.*` files in the pnpm directory
- But the current zod/core.js and ajv/dist/core.js exist (they were reinstalled at 10:27)

The key question is: did the coredump cleanup at 3:02 on 5/21 delete these files?

Let me verify by checking if the coredump cleanup command is still in the maintenance script. If it is, it would delete zod/core.js and ajv/dist/core.js every time it runs.

This is extremely likely the root cause. The `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` pattern is far too broad.

# 🔥🔥🔥 我可能找到了真正的根因！
# coredump清理命令: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`
# 这会匹配所有名为 "core.*" 的文件！
# 包括 zod/v4/core/core.js, ajv/dist/core.js 等！

echo "=== 验证：core.* glob匹配哪些pnpm文件 ==="
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.*" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
echo "个core.*文件会被删除"

echo -e "\n=== 关键文件列表 ==="
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "core.*" -type f 2>/dev/null | grep -E "zod|ajv|openclaw" | sort

echo -e "\n=== 验证：如果执行find / -name 'core.*' -type f -delete，会删掉什么？==="
echo "zod core.js: $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3 -name 'core.*' -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l) 个文件会被删"
echo "ajv core.js: $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0 -name 'core.*' -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l) 个文件会被删"
echo "openclaw core: $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@* -name 'core.*' -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l) 个文件会被删"

echo -e "\n=== 时间线验证 ==="
echo "03:02 CST - coredump清理: find / -name 'core.*' -type f -delete"
echo "  → 删除了 zod/v4/core/core.js"
echo "  → 删除了 ajv/dist/core.js"
echo "  → 删除了所有core.*文件！"
echo "03:08 CST - zod健康检查: zod损坏(文件被删)"
echo ""
echo "这就是为什么每次都是凌晨3点！coredump清理每次都删掉core.js！"

echo -e "\n=== 检查这个命令还在维护任务中吗？==="
grep -r "core\.\*" /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -r "find.*core\." /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/ 2>/dev/null | head -10


=== 验证：core.* glob匹配哪些pnpm文件 ===
26
个core.*文件会被删除

=== 关键文件列表 ===
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js.map
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/refs/json-schema-2019-09/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/refs/json-schema-2020-12/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/core.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/refs/json-schema-2019-09/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/lib/refs/json-schema-2020-12/meta/core.json
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/src/plugin-sdk/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/src/v4/core/core.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.cjs
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.cts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.d.ts
/root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js

=== 验证：如果执行find / -name 'core.*' -type f -delete，会删掉什么？===
zod core.js: 5 个文件会被删
ajv core.js: 8 个文件会被删
openclaw core: 3 个文件会被删

=== 时间线验证 ===
03:02 CST - coredump清理: find / -name 'core.*' -type f -delete
  → 删除了 zod/v4/core/core.js
  → 删除了 ajv/dist/core.js
  → 删除了所有core.*文件！
03:08 CST - zod健康检查: zod损坏(文件被删)

这就是为什么每次都是凌晨3点！coredump清理每次都删掉core.js！

=== 检查这个命令还在维护任务中吗？===


# 确认！维护任务中main agent执行的命令是:
# find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete
# 这个命令删除了26个pnpm core.*文件，包括zod和ajv的核心文件！

# 但等一下——需要验证这个命令是否真的在5月21日执行了
# 以及5月14日和5月17日是否也执行了同样的命令

echo "=== 5月21日维护任务中的coredump清理命令(从session记录) ==="
# 已经确认: 03:02 CST 执行了 find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete

echo -e "\n=== 检查之前的维护任务是否也执行了这个命令 ==="
# 搜索所有维护session中的"core.*"命令
for f in /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/*.jsonl; do
    [[ "$f" == *trajectory* ]] || [[ "$f" == *checkpoint* ]] && continue
    [[ -f "$f" ]] || continue
    match=$(grep -l "core\.\*.*delete\|core\.\*.*rm" "$f" 2>/dev/null)
    if [ -n "$match" ]; then
        mod=$(stat -c %Y "$f" 2>/dev/null)
        mod_date=$(date -d @$mod '+%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
        echo "  $mod_date: $(basename $f)"
    fi
done

echo -e "\n=== 更关键：检查这个命令是否在维护任务prompt中 ==="
# 这个命令是main agent自己构造的，还是从prompt/脚本中获取的？
# 查看cron job中维护任务的消息
cat /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
try:
    jobs = json.load(sys.stdin)
    for j in jobs:
        if not isinstance(j, dict):
            continue
        name = j.get('name', '')
        if '维护' in name or 'nightly' in name.lower() or '凌晨' in name or '3:00' in name:
            msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')
            print(f'Job: {name}')
            print(f'Message: {msg}')
            print()
except Exception as e:
    print(f'Error: {e}')
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 检查维护脚本 ==="
ls /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/*clean* /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/*core* /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/*maint* 2>/dev/null
cat /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_system_logs.sh 2>/dev/null | grep -i "core\." | head -5


=== 5月21日维护任务中的coredump清理命令(从session记录) ===

=== 检查之前的维护任务是否也执行了这个命令 ===
  05-17 03:01: 068efc19-2522-443d-85bb-1aea10a02716.jsonl
  05-15 03:00: 07b9c43e-ba0e-4f14-bcd4-851e4305d23a.jsonl
  05-20 03:00: 12898be6-b061-476f-a51e-4a7b93edb2a7.jsonl
  05-21 09:48: 23d30c3b-2f11-4d73-97b1-f066bfcb1bb1.jsonl
  05-21 03:07: 27fca668-a55a-46bf-bece-cb1eb012b8d5.jsonl
  05-16 03:00: 28050855-24a5-410b-a8ac-feb5622647ef.jsonl
  05-14 03:01: 3d8be280-dd9e-4bea-bccd-33e69b2f9f01.jsonl
  04-20 18:08: 522df557-c935-4850-af1b-b4fbae6f75b0.jsonl
  05-19 03:00: 647fb532-648c-4d56-8be9-4f61bc7bc450.jsonl
  05-14 07:47: e831e890-4eb6-4a60-aafc-ce0470ee8643.jsonl
  05-18 03:01: fa04a3f0-8769-49f9-a64b-0a60b9758f69.jsonl

=== 更关键：检查这个命令是否在维护任务prompt中 ===

=== 检查维护脚本 ===
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_models_json_tmp.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_old_services.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_old_sessions.py
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_prompt_sources.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_python_cache.py
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_system_logs.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_system_logs.sh.bak
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_test_subagents.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_versions.py
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cron_enhanced_cleanup.txt
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/enhanced_cleanup_cron.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/enhanced_system_cleanup.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/enhanced_system_cleanup_with_args.sh
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/experiment_file_cleaner.py
/root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/fix_cleanup_bug.sh


# 每次凌晨维护都有"core.*"删除！5月14/15/16/17/18/19/20/21日全有！
# 这就是zod反复损坏的根因！

# 检查cleanup_system_logs.sh中的coredump清理逻辑
echo "=== cleanup_system_logs.sh ==="
cat /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_system_logs.sh 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== enhanced_system_cleanup.sh ==="
cat /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/enhanced_system_cleanup.sh 2>/dev/null | head -40


=== cleanup_system_logs.sh ===
#!/bin/bash
# 清理系统日志脚本 - 每日凌晨3点执行

echo "🔄 开始清理系统日志 - $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')"
echo "=================================================="

# 1. 清理workspace日志（保留最近3天）
echo "1. 清理workspace日志（保留最近3天）..."
workspace_logs=$(find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs -type f -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
echo "   ✅ 清理了 $workspace_logs 个旧日志文件"

# 2. 清理系统日志（保留最近7天）
echo "2. 清理系统日志（保留最近7天）..."
system_logs=$(find /var/log -type f -name "*.log" -mtime +7 -delete 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
echo "   ✅ 清理了 $system_logs 个系统日志文件"

# 3. 清理临时文件（保留最近1天）
echo "3. 清理临时文件（保留最近1天）..."
temp_files=$(find /root/.openclaw/workspace/temp -type f -mtime +1 -delete 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
echo "   ✅ 清理了 $temp_files 个临时文件"

# 4. 清理缓存（⚠ 已禁用drop_caches - 会导致pnpm copy模式文件损坏）
# drop_caches: 3 会清空Linux页面缓存，在pnpm copy模式下
# 导致模块文件缓存丢失，引发zod等核心模块损坏
# 参考：2026-05-14/17 凌晨3点网关崩溃根因分析
# sync
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 2>/dev/null
echo "   ⚠ drop_caches已禁用（防止pnpm模块损坏）"

# 5. 显示清理后磁盘空间
echo "5. 清理后磁盘空间："
df -h / | tail -1 | awk '{print "   可用空间: "$4"/"$2" ("$5" 使用率)"}'

# 6. 记录清理日志
log_file="/root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/cleanup_$(date '+%Y%m%d').log"
echo "清理完成时间: $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')" >> "$log_file"
echo "清理文件统计: workspace日志($workspace_logs), 系统日志($system_logs), 临时文件($temp_files)" >> "$log_file"

echo "=================================================="
echo "✅ 系统日志清理完成 - $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')"
=== enhanced_system_cleanup.sh ===
#!/bin/bash
# 增强版系统清理脚本 - 整合清理经验
# 基于系统分析发现的磁盘占用模式和问题
# 运行时间: 每日 03:00 (凌晨), 09:00 (上午), 15:00 (下午), 21:00 (晚上)

echo "🧹 **增强版系统清理脚本**"
echo "=========================="
echo "启动时间: $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')"
echo "整合的清理经验: coredump文件 + 中间文件 + 缓存清理"
echo "================================================"

# 记录清理开始时间
START_TIME=$(date +%s)
LOG_FILE="/root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/enhanced_cleanup_$(date '+%Y%m%d').log"

# 1. 清理Apport coredump文件 (基于经验: 占用了6.7G空间)
echo ""
echo "🔍 **1. 清理Apport Coredump文件**"
echo "-------------------------------"
echo "目标: /var/lib/apport/coredump/"
echo "经验: Node.js进程崩溃产生巨大core文件（3.4G）"
echo "风险: 安全删除，不影响系统运行"

COREDUMP_CLEANED=0
if [ -d "/var/lib/apport/coredump/" ]; then
    # 统计清理前的文件数量和大小
    BEFORE_COUNT=$(ls -1 /var/lib/apport/coredump/ 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
    if [ "$BEFORE_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then
        BEFORE_SIZE=$(du -sh /var/lib/apport/coredump/ 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
        echo "  清理前: $BEFORE_COUNT 个文件, 约 $BEFORE_SIZE"

        # 清理coredump文件
        rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/*
        echo "  ✅ 已清理Apport coredump文件"
        COREDUMP_CLEANED=1
    else
        echo "  ℹ  没有coredump文件需要清理"
    fi
else
    echo "  ℹ  coredump目录不存在"


# cleanup_system_logs.sh中没有"core.*"删除
# 但main agent的维护任务是直接执行命令，不是调用脚本
# 看维护任务的prompt和agent自己构造的命令

echo "=== 5月21日维护任务中main agent执行的coredump清理命令 ==="
grep "core\.\*.*delete\|core\.\*.*rm\|find.*core\." /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/27fca668-a55a-46bf-bece-cb1eb012b8d5.jsonl 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
for line in sys.stdin:
    try:
        d = json.loads(line.strip())
        ts = d.get('timestamp', '')
        msg = d.get('message', {})
        role = msg.get('role', '')
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        for c in content:
            if c.get('type') == 'toolCall':
                tool = c.get('name', '')
                args = c.get('arguments', {})
                if isinstance(args, dict):
                    cmd = str(args.get('command', ''))[:500]
                else:
                    cmd = str(args)[:500]
                print(f'{ts} [{role}] {cmd}')
    except:
        pass
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 检查cron维护任务的prompt ==="
# 找到凌晨维护的cron job
python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    content = f.read()
# Try parsing as JSON array
try:
    jobs = json.loads(content)
except:
    # Try line by line
    jobs = []
    for line in content.strip().split('\n'):
        try:
            jobs.append(json.loads(line))
        except:
            pass
for j in jobs:
    if not isinstance(j, dict):
        continue
    name = j.get('name', '')
    if '维护' in name or 'nightly' in name.lower() or '凌晨' in name:
        msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')
        print(f'Job: {name}')
        print(f'Message:')
        print(msg)
        print()
" 2>/dev/null


=== 5月21日维护任务中main agent执行的coredump清理命令 ===
2026-05-20T19:02:45.737Z [assistant] find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null; echo "coredump清理完成"

=== 检查cron维护任务的prompt ===


# 确认了！命令是 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`
# 这个命令删除了系统中所有名为"core.*"的文件
# 包括zod/v4/core/core.js, ajv/dist/core.js, openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js等

# 现在需要确认：这个命令是main agent自己构造的，还是cron prompt指定的？

echo "=== 查找凌晨维护的cron job配置 ==="
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json

with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    content = f.read().strip()

# jobs.json可能是JSON数组或每行一个JSON
try:
    jobs = json.loads(content)
except:
    jobs = []
    for line in content.split('\n'):
        line = line.strip()
        if line:
            try:
                jobs.append(json.loads(line))
            except:
                pass

for j in jobs:
    if not isinstance(j, dict):
        continue
    name = j.get('name', '')
    sched = j.get('schedule', {})
    expr = sched.get('expr', '')
    msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')
    # 查找包含"维护"或"清理"或凌晨3点的任务
    if any(kw in name for kw in ['维护', 'nightly', '凌晨', '清理', 'cleanup']) or '3:00' in name or '03:00' in name:
        print(f'=== Job: {name} ===')
        print(f'Schedule: {expr}')
        print(f'Message: {msg[:1000]}')
        print()
    # 也检查message中包含coredump的
    if 'coredump' in msg.lower() or 'core.' in msg:
        print(f'=== Job(coredump): {name} ===')
        print(f'Schedule: {expr}')
        print(f'Message: {msg[:1000]}')
        print()
PYEOF


=== 查找凌晨维护的cron job配置 ===


# 没有输出，说明当前cron jobs中没有凌晨维护任务
# 但之前有——可能是被删除了或之前的session中的

# 搜索所有cron job
python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    jobs = json.loads(f.read())
for j in jobs:
    if not isinstance(j, dict):
        continue
    name = j.get('name', '')
    sched = j.get('schedule', {})
    expr = sched.get('expr', '')
    kind = sched.get('kind', '')
    msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')[:200]
    enabled = j.get('enabled', True)
    print(f'{name} | {kind}:{expr} | enabled={enabled} | {msg[:100]}')
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 检查之前存在的凌晨维护cron job(搜索jobs.json备份) ==="
for f in /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.bak /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.pre-cleanup.bak; do
    if [ -f "$f" ]; then
        echo "--- $f ---"
        python3 -c "
import json
with open('$f') as fh:
    jobs = json.loads(fh.read())
for j in jobs:
    if not isinstance(j, dict):
        continue
    name = j.get('name', '')
    if '维护' in name or 'nightly' in name.lower() or '凌晨' in name:
        msg = j.get('payload', {}).get('message', '')[:500]
        print(f'  {name}: {msg}')
" 2>/dev/null
    fi
done


=== 检查之前存在的凌晨维护cron job(搜索jobs.json备份) ===
--- /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.bak ---
--- /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.pre-cleanup.bak ---


自恢复检查 (每30分钟)

执行一键自恢复脚本: bash /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/self_heal.sh --auto。完成后报告结果，只有发现问题才通知。

models.json防护 (每小时)

执行models.json防护：
1. 检查 /root/.openclaw/agents/main/agent/models.json 完整性
2. 清理临时文件: rm -f /root/.openclaw/agents/main/agent/models.json.*.tmp
3. 如发现文件被篡改或损坏，从备份恢复
4. 记录监控日志

zod模块健康检查 (每30分钟)

运行zod模块健康检查脚本: bash /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/zod_healthcheck.sh，如果修复了zod模块，推送微信通知告知用户。

Summary: Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin

Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin

统一健康检查 (每30分钟)

执行统一健康检查：
1. 端口检查: 8000/8001/8081端口是否监听，HTTP是否正常响应
2. 服务检查: manhua-studio-8000 systemd服务状态
3. 进程泄漏: 检测僵尸进程和泄漏的sleep/python进程，发现则直接清理
4. 磁盘检查: 使用率超过85%则告警
5. 漫画生产: 检查manhua-production相关进程状态
6. 中断恢复: 检查关键服务的健康状态
7. 残留清理: 发现异常进程(僵尸/泄漏的sleep)直接kill清理
8. 异常时主动推送微信告警
脚本参考: /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/check_8000_service.sh

自动清理旧sessions和cron会话

运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/cleanup_old_sessions.py --force 清理旧cron会话和过期session文件。执行后报告清理结果。

Summary: ⚠ Agent couldn't generate a response. Please try again.

cron: job interrupted by gateway restart

Memory Dreaming Promotion

[managed-by=memory-core.short-term-promotion] Promote weighted short-term recalls into MEMORY.md (limit=10, minScore=0.800, minRecallCount=3, minUniqueQueries=3, recencyHalfLifeDays=14, maxAgeDays=30).

__openclaw_memory_core_short_term_promotion_dream__

last -> no route, will fail-closed: Channel is required (no configured channels detected). Run openclaw channels add to configure one, or pass --channel <channel> after enabling a channel. Use openclaw channels list --all to see available channel ids. Set delivery.channel explicitly or use a main session with a previous channel.

jobs total offset limit hasMore nextOffset deliveryPreviews


Now I have the full picture. The cron job that triggers the nightly maintenance is not in the current cron list - it was likely removed or is in a different session. But the key evidence is:

1. The main agent's maintenance task (which ran at 3:00 AM every day) included a coredump cleanup command: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`
2. This command matches ALL files named "core.*" anywhere on the filesystem, including pnpm's `zod/v4/core/core.js` and `ajv/dist/core.js`
3. This is why zod gets corrupted every time at around 3 AM - the maintenance task literally deletes the core.js files!

The two problems:
1. **zod repeatedly corrupted**: Because `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` deletes all files matching "core.*" including zod's core.js and ajv's core.js
2. **child process killed by SIGTERM**: Because `KillMode=control-group` means `systemctl stop` sends SIGTERM to all processes in the cgroup, including the zod_healthcheck.sh script

Now I need to:
1. Fix the nightly maintenance to not delete core.* files in pnpm directories
2. The zod_healthcheck.sh fix (systemd-run) is already done
3. Document this finding

But wait - the nightly maintenance cron job is not in the current list. Where is it? It might be a session-level task that was set up differently. Let me check if there's a "凌晨统一维护" cron job that was deleted or is in a different location.

Actually, looking at the session data, the maintenance task at 3:00 was triggered by a cron job called "unified-nightly-maintenance 凌晨统一维护 (3:00)". But it's not in the current cron list. It might have been removed during the cron cleanup.

Let me check if there are more sessions to find the exact cron job, but more importantly, I need to:
1. Make sure no current or future maintenance task uses `find / -name "core.*" -delete`
2. Fix the 20 empty files in pnpm store
3. Document the root cause

Actually, I should also check the cleanup scripts to make sure they don't contain this dangerous pattern.

exec

# 现在查找凌晨维护cron job是否还存在
# 从session记录中找cron job名称: "unified-nightly-maintenance 凌晨统一维护 (3:00)"

echo "=== 搜索凌晨维护cron job ==="
# 检查所有session中是否有这个cron任务的记录
grep -l "unified-nightly-maintenance\|凌晨统一维护" /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -5

echo -e "\n=== 检查所有agent的cron配置 ==="
# 也检查cron jobs-state.json
python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs-state.json') as f:
    states = json.loads(f.read())
for job_id, state in states.items():
    if not isinstance(state, dict):
        continue
    # 查找凌晨维护相关
    print(f'{job_id}: lastRun={state.get(\"lastRunStatus\", \"?\")}, lastError={str(state.get(\"lastError\", \"\"))[:100]}')
" 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo -e "\n=== 检查main agent的cron sessions ==="
# 搜索main agent最近有凌晨维护的session
for f in /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/*.jsonl; do
    [[ "$f" == *trajectory* ]] || [[ "$f" == *checkpoint* ]] && continue
    [[ -f "$f" ]] || continue
    if grep -q "凌晨统一维护\|unified-nightly-maintenance" "$f" 2>/dev/null; then
        mod=$(stat -c %Y "$f" 2>/dev/null)
        mod_date=$(date -d @$mod '+%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
        echo "  $mod_date: $(basename $f)"
    fi
done | sort


=== 搜索凌晨维护cron job ===
/root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/068efc19-2522-443d-85bb-1aea10a02716.jsonl
/root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/07b9c43e-ba0e-4f14-bcd4-851e4305d23a.jsonl
/root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/12898be6-b061-476f-a51e-4a7b93edb2a7.jsonl
/root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/12898be6-b061-476f-a51e-4a7b93edb2a7.trajectory.jsonl
/root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/23d30c3b-2f11-4d73-97b1-f066bfcb1bb1.jsonl

=== 检查所有agent的cron配置 ===
jobs: lastRun=?, lastError=

=== 检查main agent的cron sessions ===
  05-14 03:01: 3d8be280-dd9e-4bea-bccd-33e69b2f9f01.jsonl
  05-14 07:47: e831e890-4eb6-4a60-aafc-ce0470ee8643.jsonl
  05-15 03:00: 07b9c43e-ba0e-4f14-bcd4-851e4305d23a.jsonl
  05-16 03:00: 28050855-24a5-410b-a8ac-feb5622647ef.jsonl
  05-17 03:01: 068efc19-2522-443d-85bb-1aea10a02716.jsonl
  05-18 03:01: fa04a3f0-8769-49f9-a64b-0a60b9758f69.jsonl
  05-19 03:00: 647fb532-648c-4d56-8be9-4f61bc7bc450.jsonl
  05-20 03:00: 12898be6-b061-476f-a51e-4a7b93edb2a7.jsonl
  05-21 03:07: 27fca668-a55a-46bf-bece-cb1eb012b8d5.jsonl
  05-21 09:48: 23d30c3b-2f11-4d73-97b1-f066bfcb1bb1.jsonl


# 确认5月14日维护任务也执行了同样的coredump清理命令
echo "=== 5月14日维护任务中的coredump清理 ==="
grep "core\.\*.*delete\|core\.\*.*rm\|find.*core\." /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/3d8be280-dd9e-4bea-bccd-33e69b2f9f01.jsonl 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
for line in sys.stdin:
    try:
        d = json.loads(line.strip())
        msg = d.get('message', {})
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        for c in content:
            if c.get('type') == 'toolCall':
                args = c.get('arguments', {})
                cmd = str(args.get('command', ''))[:500]
                print(f'  {cmd}')
    except:
        pass
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 5月17日维护任务中的coredump清理 ==="
grep "core\.\*.*delete\|core\.\*.*rm\|find.*core\." /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/068efc19-2522-443d-85bb-1aea10a02716.jsonl 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
for line in sys.stdin:
    try:
        d = json.loads(line.strip())
        msg = d.get('message', {})
        content = msg.get('content', [])
        for c in content:
            if c.get('type') == 'toolCall':
                args = c.get('arguments', {})
                cmd = str(args.get('command', ''))[:500]
                print(f'  {cmd}')
    except:
        pass
" 2>/dev/null

echo -e "\n=== 检查cron job的prompt中是否包含coredump清理 ==="
# 搜索cron prompt
grep "凌晨统一维护" /root/.openclaw/agents/main/sessions/27fca668-a55a-46bf-bece-cb1eb012b8d5.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -1 | python3 -c "
import json, sys
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if line:
    d = json.loads(line.strip())
    msg = d.get('message', {})
    content = msg.get('content', [])
    for c in content:
        if c.get('type') == 'text':
            print(c['text'][:2000])
" 2>/dev/null


=== 5月14日维护任务中的coredump清理 ===
  find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete 2>&1 | tail -5; echo "=== LOG CLEANUP DONE ==="
  find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -type f -delete 2>&1 | tail -5; echo "=== REPORT CLEANUP DONE ==="
  find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null; echo "=== COREDUMP CLEANUP DONE ==="

=== 5月17日维护任务中的coredump清理 ===
  find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete 2>&1; echo "EXIT:$?"
  find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete 2>&1; echo "EXIT:$?"
  find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null; echo "EXIT:$?"

=== 检查cron job的prompt中是否包含coredump清理 ===
[cron:unified-nightly-maintenance 凌晨统一维护 (3:00)] 执行凌晨统一维护任务：
1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete
2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete
3. 清理coredump: find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null
4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup
5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh
6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh
7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f "sleep 300" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程
8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）

⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复）：
- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway
- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop
- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run
- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令
- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启
- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）
- 只做清理，不动网关
Current time: Thursday, May 21st, 2026 - 3:00 AM (Asia/Shanghai)
Reference UTC: 2026-05-20 19:00 UTC


**根因100%确认！**

Cron prompt第3条明确写着：`find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`

这个命令删除了所有名为`core.*`的文件，包括：
- `zod/v4/core/core.js`
- `ajv/dist/core.js`
- `openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js`
- 还有26个其他`core.*`文件

这就是为什么每次都是凌晨3点zod损坏——**cron维护任务自己把core.js删了**！之前一直以为是`drop_caches`导致文件损坏，实际上是被直接删掉了。

立即修复：

# 立即修复：1) 清理当前被误删为0字节的store文件
# 2) 修复cron维护任务的prompt

echo "=== 修复1：清理pnpm store中的0字节文件 ==="
# 找到所有0字节的store文件
store_empty_files=$(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files -type f -empty 2>/dev/null)
echo "空store文件数: $(echo "$store_empty_files" | grep -c .)"

# 删除这些空文件，让pnpm store prune能清理
echo "$store_empty_files" | while read f; do
    if [ -n "$f" ] && [ -f "$f" ]; then
        # 先断开所有硬链接
        nlinks=$(stat -c %h "$f" 2>/dev/null)
        if [ "$nlinks" -gt 1 ]; then
            # 找到pnpm目录中引用这个inode的文件
            inode=$(stat -c %i "$f")
            find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -inum "$inode" -delete 2>/dev/null
        fi
        rm -f "$f"
    fi
done

echo "清理后空文件数: $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/store/v10/files -type f -empty 2>/dev/null | wc -l)"
echo "清理后pnpm空文件数: $(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name '*.js' -empty 2>/dev/null | wc -l)"


=== 修复1：清理pnpm store中的0字节文件 ===
空store文件数: 1
清理后空文件数: 0
清理后pnpm空文件数: 0


# 修复2：重装被删除文件对应的包
# 先检查哪些包受了影响
echo "=== 检查hono包是否被网关加载 ==="
node -e "try { require('hono'); console.log('hono: loaded'); } catch(e) { console.log('hono: not loaded'); }" 2>/dev/null

# 这些hono等包虽然不是openclaw直接依赖，但可能是间接依赖
# 重装确保所有文件完整
echo -e "\n=== pnpm store prune + 重装 ==="
pnpm store prune 2>&1 | tail -5

echo -e "\n=== 验证网关仍能正常启动 ==="
# 网关当前正常运行，检查关键模块
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js && echo "zod:OK" || echo "zod:MISSING"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js && echo "ajv:OK" || echo "ajv:MISSING"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js && echo "openclaw-sdk:OK" || echo "openclaw-sdk:MISSING"


=== 检查hono包是否被网关加载 ===
hono: not loaded

=== pnpm store prune + 重装 ===
Removed all cached metadata files
Removed 14375 files
Removed 208 packages

=== 验证网关仍能正常启动 ===
zod:OK
ajv:OK
openclaw-sdk:OK


现在修复cron维护任务的prompt，删除`find / -name "core.*"`这个致命命令：


zod模块健康检查 (每30分钟)

Summary: Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin

Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin


exec

# 凌晨维护cron job "unified-nightly-maintenance" 不在当前job列表中
# 但它之前确实存在并被执行了。可能是在之前的网关重启中丢失了
# 或者它的session还在但job被删了

# 关键是：这个cron job的prompt中有 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete`
# 如果这个job还存在，必须修改
# 如果不存在了，确保不会重新创建

# 搜索所有session中是否有这个cron job的注册
echo "=== 搜索unified-nightly-maintenance cron job的创建记录 ==="
grep -r "unified-nightly-maintenance" /root/.openclaw/cron/ 2>/dev/null | head -5
grep -r "凌晨统一维护" /root/.openclaw/cron/ 2>/dev/null | head -5

echo -e "\n=== 检查cron runs目录 ==="
ls -lt /root/.openclaw/cron/runs/ 2>/dev/null | head -10

echo -e "\n=== 搜索cron jobs-state中的维护任务 ==="
python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs-state.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
if isinstance(data, dict):
    for k, v in data.items():
        if isinstance(v, dict):
            name = v.get('name', '')
            if '维护' in name or 'nightly' in name.lower():
                print(f'  {k}: {name}')
" 2>/dev/null


=== 搜索unified-nightly-maintenance cron job的创建记录 ===
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.bak:      "id": "unified-nightly-maintenance",
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs-state.json:    "unified-nightly-maintenance": {
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json:      "id": "unified-nightly-maintenance",
/root/.openclaw/cron/runs/unified-nightly-maintenance.jsonl:{"ts":1778638995286,"jobId":"unified-nightly-maintenance","action":"finished","status":"error","error":"cron: job interrupted by gateway restart","delivered":false,"deliveryStatus":"unknown","deliveryError":"cron: job interrupted by gateway restart","runAtMs":1778612400002,"durationMs":26595247,"nextRunAtMs":1778698800000}
/root/.openclaw/cron/runs/unified-nightly-maintenance.jsonl:{"ts":1778716067756,"jobId":"unified-nightly-maintenance","action":"finished","status":"ok","summary":"⚠ **凌晨维护完成 — 有1项需关注**\n\n**✅ 已完成：**\n- 系统日志清理（>3天）\n- 旧报告清理（>7天）\n- 临时文件清理\n- 任务历史清理\n- 系统配置备份（188K）\n- 系统性能优化（内存释放 300Mi+）\n- 残留进程清理\n- OpenClaw Gateway 重启\n\n**⚠ 需关注 — 磁盘使用率 91%：**\n```\n/dev/vda2  40G  34G  3.6G  91%\n```\n\ncoredump 全盘扫描因超时跳过，如果磁盘问题持续，建议手动排查大文件：\n```bash\ndu -sh /root/.openclaw/workspace/backups/ /var/log/ /tmp/ 2>/dev/null | sort -rh\n```","delivered":false,"deliveryStatus":"not-requested","delivery":{"intended":{"channel":"openclaw-weixin","to":"o9cq80wzTfUr0vHjrtIeUp7CaZQ0@im.wechat","source":"explicit"},"resolved":{"ok":false,"channel":"openclaw-weixin","to":null,"source":"explicit","error":"Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin"},"fallbackUsed":false,"delivered":false},"sessionId":"e831e890-4eb6-4a60-aafc-ce0470ee8643","sessionKey":"agent:main:cron:unified-nightly-maintenance:run:e831e890-4eb6-4a60-aafc-ce0470ee8643","runAtMs":1778716002757,"durationMs":64985,"nextRunAtMs":1778785200000,"model":"mimo-v2.5","provider":"xiaomi-coding","usage":{"input_tokens":38368,"output_tokens":1609,"total_tokens":19311}}
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.bak:      "name": "凌晨统一维护 (3:00)",
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json.bak:        "message": "执行凌晨统一维护任务：\n1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name \"*.log\" -mtime +3 -delete\n2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete\n3. 清理coredump: find / -name \"core.*\" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null\n4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup\n5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh\n6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh\n7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f \"sleep 300\" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程\n8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）\n\n⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复）：\n- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run\n- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令\n- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启\n- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）\n- 只做清理，不动网关"
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json:      "name": "凌晨统一维护 (3:00)",
/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json:        "message": "执行凌晨统一维护任务：\n1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name \"*.log\" -mtime +3 -delete\n2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete\n3. 清理coredump: find / -name \"core.*\" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null\n4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup\n5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh\n6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh\n7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f \"sleep 300\" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程\n8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）\n\n⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复）：\n- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run\n- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令\n- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启\n- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）\n- 只做清理，不动网关"
/root/.openclaw/cron/runs/unified-nightly-maintenance.jsonl:{"ts":1779328137728,"jobId":"unified-nightly-maintenance","action":"finished","status":"ok","summary":"**凌晨统一维护任务完成汇总：**\n\n| 任务 | 状态 | 说明 |\n|------|------|------|\n| 1. 清理系统日志 | ✅ 完成 | 已清理3天以上的.log文件 |\n| 2. 清理旧报告 | ✅ 完成 | 已清理7天以上的报告 |\n| 3. 清理coredump | ⚠ 完成 | 未找到coredump文件（退出码1，无异常） |\n| 4. 清理中断恢复测试数据 | ✅ 完成 | 任务历史清理完成 |\n| 5. 备份系统配置 | ✅ 完成 | 备份到 `/root/.openclaw/workspace/backups/20260521`，大小180K |\n| 6. 优化系统性能 | ✅ 完成 | 内存1.2Gi/3.6Gi，CPU 11.6%，磁盘74%，服务运行正常 |\n| 7. 清理残留进程 | ✅ 完成 | 无sleep 300进程，无僵尸进程 |\n\n**系统状态：** 所有维护任务顺利完成，无异常需要告警推送。","deliveryStatus":"not-requested","delivery":{"intended":{"channel":"openclaw-weixin","to":"o9cq80wzTfUr0vHjrtIeUp7CaZQ0@im.wechat","source":"explicit"},"resolved":{"ok":false,"channel":"openclaw-weixin","to":null,"source":"explicit","error":"Unsupported channel: openclaw-weixin"},"fallbackUsed":false,"delivered":false},"sessionId":"23d30c3b-2f11-4d73-97b1-f066bfcb1bb1","sessionKey":"agent:main:cron:unified-nightly-maintenance:run:23d30c3b-2f11-4d73-97b1-f066bfcb1bb1","runAtMs":1779328056394,"durationMs":81327,"nextRunAtMs":1779390000000,"model":"ark-code-latest","provider":"volcengine-agent-plan"}

=== 检查cron runs目录 ===
total 15288
-rw------- 1 root root  332904 May 21 12:05 b7c66c11-97f1-418f-9d4b-a0fcbdb784ee.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root  296276 May 21 12:02 unified-health-check.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root  155732 May 21 12:00 unified-models-json-protection.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root  145577 May 21 12:00 7476feec-bd3a-4ff9-8e06-2cd6e67e38a5.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root   76941 May 21 11:52 05cd59e4-bda9-44f0-aba3-b4c30ec2c463.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root    7526 May 21 11:42 fb782158-98e8-424c-a8b6-fd64b3bca4f3.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root    1435 May 21 10:27 6a51800b-b89a-40ff-b4c0-f0ebf0151e02.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root   27161 May 21 10:27 3cf13239-476e-4c1e-beb7-fac6eb49b230.jsonl
-rw------- 1 root root    8537 May 21 10:27 auto-sessions-cleanup-daily.jsonl

=== 搜索cron jobs-state中的维护任务 ===


# 找到了！jobs.json中确实有unified-nightly-maintenance job
# 但cron list API没显示它（可能因为分页或被过滤）
# 需要直接修改或删除这个job

# 检查这个job的完整配置
python3 -c "
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    jobs = json.load(f)
for j in jobs:
    if j.get('id') == 'unified-nightly-maintenance':
        print(json.dumps(j, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
        break
"


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 6, in <module>
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'get'

(Command exited with code 1)


# jobs.json格式有问题，试试其他方式
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
with open('/root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json') as f:
    content = f.read().strip()

# 尝试解析
try:
    data = json.loads(content)
except:
    # 逐行解析
    data = content

if isinstance(data, list):
    for j in data:
        if isinstance(j, dict) and j.get('id') == 'unified-nightly-maintenance':
            print(json.dumps(j, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
            break
elif isinstance(data, str):
    # 搜索文本
    import re
    match = re.search(r'\{[^{}]*"unified-nightly-maintenance"[^{}]*\}', content, re.DOTALL)
    if match:
        print(match.group()[:500])
PYEOF


(no output)


# 直接grep jobs.json
grep -A 30 "unified-nightly-maintenance" /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | head -35


"id": "unified-nightly-maintenance",
      "agentId": "main",
      "sessionKey": "agent:main:main",
      "name": "凌晨统一维护 (3:00)",
      "enabled": true,
      "createdAtMs": 1778588165542,
      "schedule": {
        "kind": "cron",
        "expr": "0 3 * * *",
        "tz": "Asia/Shanghai"
      },
      "sessionTarget": "isolated",
      "wakeMode": "now",
      "payload": {
        "kind": "agentTurn",
        "message": "执行凌晨统一维护任务：\n1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name \"*.log\" -mtime +3 -delete\n2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete\n3. 清理coredump: find / -name \"core.*\" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null\n4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup\n5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh\n6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh\n7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f \"sleep 300\" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程\n8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）\n\n⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复）：\n- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run\n- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令\n- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启\n- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）\n- 只做清理，不动网关"
      },
      "delivery": {
        "mode": "none",
        "channel": "openclaw-weixin",
        "to": "o9cq80wzTfUr0vHjrtIeUp7CaZQ0@im.wechat"
      },
      "state": {}
    },
    {
      "id": "unified-health-check",
      "agentId": "cto",
      "sessionKey": "agent:cto:main",
      "name": "统一健康检查 (每30分钟)",
      "enabled": true,
      "createdAtMs": 1778588165542,


找到了！现在更新这个cron job，把第3条coredump清理命令改为只清理`/var/lib/apport/coredump/`：

cron

执行凌晨统一维护任务：
1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name "*.log" -mtime +3 -delete
2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete
3. 清理coredump: rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.* 2>/dev/null (⚠ 绝对不要用 find / -name "core.*" -delete，会删掉pnpm的core.js文件！)
4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup
5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh
6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh
7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f "sleep 300" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程
8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）

⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复/模块损坏）：
- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway
- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop
- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run
- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令
- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启
- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）
- ⚠ 绝对禁止执行 find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete（会删掉zod/core.js、ajv/dist/core.js等pnpm模块文件！这是5月14/17/21日zod反复损坏的真正根因）
- 只做清理，不动网关，不碰pnpm目录


现在更新根因报告和MEMORY.md：

edit

### 第2层：zod模块为什么在3:00-3:08之间损坏？

**3:00 BOOT检查时zod还正常，3:08就损坏了。8分钟内发生了什么？**

可能原因：
1. **凌晨维护任务中的文件操作**: main agent在3:00-3:07执行了日志清理、coredump清理等，可能触发了磁盘IO竞争
2. **lighthouse-chromium持续crash重启**: 每3秒一次，12015次/天，大量磁盘IO
3. **pnpm copy模式先天脆弱**: 文件是独立副本而非硬链接，任何写入异常都可能导致文件损坏

注意：optimize_system_performance.sh中`drop_caches`已禁用（5月17日后），不是直接原因。

### 第2层：zod模块为什么在3:00-3:08之间损坏？ ✅ 已确认

**凌晨维护cron任务中的coredump清理命令 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js和ajv/dist/core.js！**

证据链：
1. cron job `unified-nightly-maintenance` prompt第3条明确写着: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null`
2. main agent session记录确认5月14/17/21日都执行了这个命令
3. 26个pnpm目录中的`core.*`文件会被匹配（zod/core.js, ajv/dist/core.js, openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js等）
4. pnpm hardlink模式下，store文件也被截断为0字节（inode 797380, Links=24, Size=0）
5. 20个空文件的SHA512 hash完全匹配空内容hash，证明是删除后重建为空

**这就是为什么zod每次都在凌晨3点损坏** — 不是drop_caches，不是磁盘IO异常，而是维护任务直接把core.js删了！

历史模式：
| 日期 | 维护任务执行时间 | zod损坏时间 | 确认执行core.*删除 |
|------|----------------|------------|-------------------|
| 5月14日 | 03:01 | 03:01 | ✅ |
| 5月17日 | 03:01 | 03:01 | ✅ |
| 5月21日 | 03:02 | 03:08 | ✅ |

**已修复**: cron job prompt已更新，coredump清理改为 `rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.*`，并增加禁止事项。


Successfully replaced 1 block(s) in /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/service-outage-root-cause-20260521.md.

     ...
  47 **致命缺陷**: zod_healthcheck.sh先stop网关再修复，但脚本本身是网关的子进程。网关stop后，脚本也被SIGTERM杀掉，`systemctl --user start`永远不会执行。
  48
  49 **为什么网关停了5.5小时没人管**: `systemctl stop`后，`Restart=always`不生效（这是systemd设计：stop视为管理员意图，restart只对crash生效）。
  50
- 51 ### 第2层：zod模块为什么在3:00-3:08之间损坏？
+ 51 ### 第2层：zod模块为什么在3:00-3:08之间损坏？ ✅ 已确认
  52
- 53 **3:00 BOOT检查时zod还正常，3:08就损坏了。8分钟内发生了什么？**
+ 53 **凌晨维护cron任务中的coredump清理命令 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js和ajv/dist/core.js！**
  54
- 55 可能原因：
- 56 1. **凌晨维护任务中的文件操作**: main agent在3:00-3:07执行了日志清理、coredump清理等，可能触发了磁盘IO竞争
- 57 2. **lighthouse-chromium持续crash重启**: 每3秒一次，12015次/天，大量磁盘IO
- 58 3. **pnpm copy模式先天脆弱**: 文件是独立副本而非硬链接，任何写入异常都可能导致文件损坏
+ 55 证据链：
+ 56 1. cron job `unified-nightly-maintenance` prompt第3条明确写着: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete 2>/dev/null`
+ 57 2. main agent session记录确认5月14/17/21日都执行了这个命令
+ 58 3. 26个pnpm目录中的`core.*`文件会被匹配（zod/core.js, ajv/dist/core.js, openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js等）
+ 59 4. pnpm hardlink模式下，store文件也被截断为0字节（inode 797380, Links=24, Size=0）
+ 60 5. 20个空文件的SHA512 hash完全匹配空内容hash，证明是删除后重建为空
  59
- 60 注意：optimize_system_performance.sh中`drop_caches`已禁用（5月17日后），不是直接原因。
+ 62 **这就是为什么zod每次都在凌晨3点损坏** — 不是drop_caches，不是磁盘IO异常，而是维护任务直接把core.js删了！
  61
+ 64 历史模式：
+ 65 | 日期 | 维护任务执行时间 | zod损坏时间 | 确认执行core.*删除 |
+ 66 |------|----------------|------------|-------------------|
+ 67 | 5月14日 | 03:01 | 03:01 | ✅ |
+ 68 | 5月17日 | 03:01 | 03:01 | ✅ |
+ 69 | 5月21日 | 03:02 | 03:08 | ✅ |
+ 70
+ 71 **已修复**: cron job prompt已更新，coredump清理改为 `rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.*`，并增加禁止事项。
+ 72
  62 ### 第3层：ajv文件为什么也损坏？
  63
  64 与zod同因——pnpm copy模式下文件系统异常导致。ajv损坏在3:08之前就存在，但网关已在运行中（模块已加载到内存），重启后才暴露。
  65
     ...


### 5月21日服务中断根因 (2026-05-21)
- **直接原因**: zod_healthcheck.sh在3:08发现zod损坏，执行`systemctl stop`停止网关后，脚本自身(网关子进程)也被SIGTERM杀掉，`start`命令永远不执行
- **5.5小时宕机**: 3:08-8:40网关停机，因`systemctl stop`后`Restart=always`不触发
- **8:40后crash loop**: ajv模块也已损坏，TAT agent触发重启后连续失败16次
- **zod损坏的真正根因**: 凌晨维护cron任务中的 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 命令直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js和ajv/dist/core.js！这是5月14/17/21日zod反复损坏的真正原因
- **修复**: ①cron job prompt已更新coredump清理为安全路径 ②zod_healthcheck.sh和self_heal.sh改用`systemd-run`独立进程 ③pnpm store中20个空文件已清理
- **报告**: `/root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/service-outage-root-cause-20260521.md`
- **关键教训**: ①任何需要stop网关的修复脚本，不能是网关子进程，必须用systemd-run/nohup隔离 ②`find / -name "core.*"` 会匹配pnpm目录中的core.js文件，绝对禁止全盘删除

### 5月21日服务中断根因 (2026-05-21)
- **直接原因**: zod_healthcheck.sh在3:08发现zod损坏，执行`systemctl stop`停止网关后，脚本自身(网关子进程)也被SIGTERM杀掉，`start`命令永远不执行
- **5.5小时宕机**: 3:08-8:40网关停机，因`systemctl stop`后`Restart=always`不触发
- **8:40后crash loop**: ajv模块也已损坏，TAT agent触发重启后连续失败16次
- **修复**: zod_healthcheck.sh和self_heal.sh改用`systemd-run`独立进程执行stop+修复+start
- **报告**: `/root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/service-outage-root-cause-20260521.md`
- **关键教训**: 任何需要stop网关的修复脚本，**不能是网关子进程**，必须用systemd-run/nohup隔离


Successfully replaced 1 block(s) in /root/.openclaw/workspace/MEMORY.md.

     ...
  40 ### 5月21日服务中断根因 (2026-05-21)
  41 - **直接原因**: zod_healthcheck.sh在3:08发现zod损坏，执行`systemctl stop`停止网关后，脚本自身(网关子进程)也被SIGTERM杀掉，`start`命令永远不执行
  42 - **5.5小时宕机**: 3:08-8:40网关停机，因`systemctl stop`后`Restart=always`不触发
  43 - **8:40后crash loop**: ajv模块也已损坏，TAT agent触发重启后连续失败16次
- 44 - **修复**: zod_healthcheck.sh和self_heal.sh改用`systemd-run`独立进程执行stop+修复+start
+ 44 - **zod损坏的真正根因**: 凌晨维护cron任务中的 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 命令直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js和ajv/dist/core.js！这是5月14/17/21日zod反复损坏的真正原因
+ 45 - **修复**: ①cron job prompt已更新coredump清理为安全路径 ②zod_healthcheck.sh和self_heal.sh改用`systemd-run`独立进程 ③pnpm store中20个空文件已清理
  45 - **报告**: `/root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/service-outage-root-cause-20260521.md`
- 46 - **关键教训**: 任何需要stop网关的修复脚本，**不能是网关子进程**，必须用systemd-run/nohup隔离
+ 47 - **关键教训**: ①任何需要stop网关的修复脚本，不能是网关子进程，必须用systemd-run/nohup隔离 ②`find / -name "core.*"` 会匹配pnpm目录中的core.js文件，绝对禁止全盘删除
  47
  48 ### 安全配置策略 (2026-05-21 更新)
  49 - **不再恢复bind/allowInsecureAuth/dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth到安全值**
  50 - 原因: 用户需要bind=lan才能远程登录控制面板
     ...


### 模型故障教训 (2026-05-20)
- **模型配额耗尽 = 系统瘫痪**: 没有fallback的模型是单点故障，5月20日因GLM-5.1配额耗尽导致网关无响应30+分钟
- **凌晨cron重启 + 模型故障 = 死循环**: boot检查失败触发重启，重启后又用同一故障模型
- **多通道同模型≠冗余**: arkcode和glmcode都是GLM-5.1但走不同通道，配额独立，可以做互备
- **所有Agent必须配置fallback**: 否则`model-fallback/decision: next=none`直接失败

### zod反复损坏的真正根因 (2026-05-21 纠正)
- **之前认为是drop_caches导致文件损坏 — 错误！**
- **真正原因**: 凌晨维护cron任务中的 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 命令直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js、ajv/dist/core.js等26个文件
- **证据**: 20个空文件共享同一inode(797380)，SHA512 hash完全匹配空内容，证明是被删除后重建为空
- **历史**: 5月14/17/21日每次凌晨3点维护都执行了这个命令，导致zod/ajv每次都被删
- **已修复**: cron job prompt已更新，coredump清理改为 `rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.*`
- **绝对禁止**: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` — 会匹配pnpm目录中的core.js文件


     ...
  78 - **凌晨cron重启 + 模型故障 = 死循环**: boot检查失败触发重启，重启后又用同一故障模型
  79 - **多通道同模型≠冗余**: arkcode和glmcode都是GLM-5.1但走不同通道，配额独立，可以做互备
  80 - **所有Agent必须配置fallback**: 否则`model-fallback/decision: next=none`直接失败
  81
+ 82 ### zod反复损坏的真正根因 (2026-05-21 纠正)
+ 83 - **之前认为是drop_caches导致文件损坏 — 错误！**
+ 84 - **真正原因**: 凌晨维护cron任务中的 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 命令直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js、ajv/dist/core.js等26个文件
+ 85 - **证据**: 20个空文件共享同一inode(797380)，SHA512 hash完全匹配空内容，证明是被删除后重建为空
+ 86 - **历史**: 5月14/17/21日每次凌晨3点维护都执行了这个命令，导致zod/ajv每次都被删
+ 87 - **已修复**: cron job prompt已更新，coredump清理改为 `rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.*`
+ 88 - **绝对禁止**: `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` — 会匹配pnpm目录中的core.js文件
+ 89
  82 ### 关键技术教训 (按频率排序)
  83
  84 **前后端API不匹配 (发生6次)**:
  85 - 前端调用的每个URL后端必须有对应路由，405=方法不对，404=路由不存在
     ...


最后验证：

exec

echo "=== 验证所有修复 ==="

echo "1. zod/ajv模块完整性:"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js && echo "  zod: OK" || echo "  zod: MISSING"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js && echo "  ajv: OK" || echo "  ajv: MISSING"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/openclaw@2026.5.19/node_modules/openclaw/dist/plugin-sdk/core.js && echo "  openclaw-sdk: OK" || echo "  openclaw-sdk: MISSING"

echo -e "\n2. pnpm空文件:"
empty_count=$(find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
echo "  空文件数: $empty_count"

echo -e "\n3. 网关和8000端口:"
echo "  网关: $(systemctl --user is-active openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null)"
echo "  8000: $(systemctl --user is-active manhua-studio-8000 2>/dev/null)"

echo -e "\n4. zod_healthcheck.sh 语法:"
bash -n /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/zod_healthcheck.sh && echo "  OK" || echo "  FAIL"

echo -e "\n5. self_heal.sh 语法:"
bash -n /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/self_heal.sh && echo "  OK" || echo "  FAIL"

echo -e "\n6. cron job unified-nightly-maintenance prompt:"
grep "core.*" /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | grep -c "apport/coredump" | xargs -I{} echo "  安全路径引用: {} 处"
grep "find / -name" /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | grep -c "core" | xargs -I{} echo "  全盘删除引用: {} 处(应为0)"


=== 验证所有修复 ===
1. zod/ajv模块完整性:
  zod: OK
  ajv: OK
  openclaw-sdk: OK

2. pnpm空文件:
  空文件数: 0

3. 网关和8000端口:
  网关: active
  8000: active

4. zod_healthcheck.sh 语法:
  OK

5. self_heal.sh 语法:
  OK

6. cron job unified-nightly-maintenance prompt:
  安全路径引用: 1 处
  全盘删除引用: 1 处(应为0)


# 还有一个全盘删除引用，检查是否是警告文本中的引用
grep "find / -name.*core" /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null


"message": "执行凌晨统一维护任务：\n1. 清理系统日志: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/logs/ -name \"*.log\" -mtime +3 -delete\n2. 清理旧报告: find /root/.openclaw/workspace/reports/ -mtime +7 -delete\n3. 清理coredump: rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.* 2>/dev/null (⚠ 绝对不要用 find / -name \"core.*\" -delete，会删掉pnpm的core.js文件！)\n4. 清理中断恢复测试数据: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/robust_task_manager.sh cleanup\n5. 备份系统配置: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/backup_config.sh\n6. 优化系统性能: 运行 /root/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/optimize_system_performance.sh\n7. 清理残留进程: pkill -f \"sleep 300\" 2>/dev/null; 清理僵尸进程\n8. 汇总维护结果（仅异常时推送告警）\n\n⚠ 绝对禁止事项（违反会导致网关停止后无法自动恢复/模块损坏）：\n- 禁止执行 systemctl --user stop/restart openclaw-gateway\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway restart/stop\n- 禁止执行 openclaw gateway run\n- 禁止执行任何会导致网关进程终止的命令\n- 网关由systemd管理，Restart=always只对crash生效，手动stop后不会自动重启\n- 禁止执行 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches（会导致pnpm模块损坏）\n- ⚠ 绝对禁止执行 find / -name \"core.*\" -type f -delete（会删掉zod/core.js、ajv/dist/core.js等pnpm模块文件！这是5月14/17/21日zod反复损坏的真正根因）\n- 只做清理，不动网关，不碰pnpm目录"


是警告文本中的引用，不是命令。全部验证通过。

---

## 两个核心问题的根因

### 问题1：zod为什么一而再再而三被损坏？

**根因：凌晨维护cron任务 `unified-nightly-maintenance` 第3条命令 `find / -name "core.*" -type f -delete` 直接删除了zod/v4/core/core.js和ajv/dist/core.js**

这不是drop_caches导致文件损坏，而是**被自己的维护脚本删掉了**。证据：
- 5月14/17/21日，每次凌晨3点维护后zod都损坏
- pnpm目录中20个空文件共享同一inode(797380)，SHA512匹配空内容hash
- main agent session记录确认每次都执行了这个find命令
- cron job prompt中明确写着这条命令

**已修复**：coredump清理改为 `rm -f /var/lib/apport/coredump/core.*`，只清理真正的coredump文件

### 问题2：网关子进程为什么被SIGTERM杀掉？

**根因：`KillMode=control-group` — systemctl stop向整个cgroup发送SIGTERM**

zod_healthcheck.sh通过cron运行，是网关子进程(cgroup成员)。当脚本执行`systemctl stop openclaw-gateway`时：
1. systemd向cgroup中所有进程(包括脚本自身)发SIGTERM
2. 脚本被杀，`systemctl start`永远不执行
3. `systemctl stop`后`Restart=always`不触发(这是systemd设计)
4. 网关停机直到有人手动启动

**已修复**：zod_healthcheck.sh和self_heal.sh改用`systemd-run`创建独立cgroup执行stop+修复+start，不受网关cgroup的SIGTERM影响


[OpenClaw heartbeat poll]


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /root/.openclaw/workspace/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md.

Additional context from HEARTBEAT.md:
# HEARTBEAT.md - 智能任务检查

**最后更新**: 2026-05-18 09:35

## 🟢 **三大根因问题已彻底解决 (2026-05-18)**

### 1. ✅ 8000端口systemd服务
- 服务: `manhua-studio-8000.service` (enabled + active)
- 网关重启不再影响8000端口

### 2. ✅ TAT agent保持运行
- `tat_agent.service`: enabled + active
- 腾讯云Lighthouse AI在服务故障时自动介入，会修改安全配置
- 已建立配置守护脚本自动恢复安全配置
- **真正根因**: 磁盘/文件系统问题导致zod/venv文件损坏，腾讯云AI只是响应性地修复

### 3. ✅ Python venv已重建
- 72个空.py文件问题已修复
- 核心依赖已重新安装

## 🔴 **今日重大事件 (2026-05-16)**

### 腾讯云AI第三次修复引入问题
- 腾讯云TAT agent远程执行了 `pnpm remove -g openclaw` + `pnpm install -g openclaw@latest --force` + `openclaw doctor`
- doctor --fix 这次没有写入配置污染（网关在运行中阻止了写入）
- 但zod@4.4.3/core.js再次损坏，网关崩溃约15分钟
- Python venv也出现模块损坏（click.core、pip._vendor.certifi.core等29个空.py文件）

### 根因分析结论
- **pnpm package-import-method=copy**：所有文件都是独立副本，没有store硬链接保护
- **磁盘空间压力**：78%→69%（清理3.5GB后），高磁盘使用可能导致写入不完整
- **腾讯云TAT agent**：远程执行修复命令可能造成并发写入冲突
- **系统性损坏模式**：Node.js(pnpm)和Python(venv)同时出现模块损坏，指向底层磁盘/文件系统问题

### 已清理磁盘空间
- ✅ 删除旧备份 2.4GB (`/root/.openclaw-backups/20260515_085944/`)
- ✅ 删除旧版openclaw-run 1.1GB (`/root/openclaw-run/`)
- ✅ 重建Python venv（29个空文件修复）
- ✅ 重启8000端口服务

### 待办
- [ ] 清理 `/root/data/disk/openclaw-sessions-archive/` 1.5GB
- [ ] 清理 `/root/data/disk/projects/` 720MB
- [ ] 将pnpm package-import-method改为hardlink
- [ ] 禁用腾讯云TAT agent的自动修复
- [ ] 建立8000端口systemd服务（防止被网关重启杀死）

## 🎯 **任务优先级**

### **🔴 高优先级任务 (立即检查)**
1. 检查微信通知通道状态 - openclaw-weixin v2.4.3 ✅
2. 监控磁盘使用率 - 当前69%（警告线85%）✅ 已从78%降至69%
3. 验证网关systemd服务状态 - 当前active ✅
4. 检查8000端口服务是否存活 - 需关注（易被网关重启杀死）

### **🟡 中优先级任务 (定期检查)**
1. 检查火山套餐使用情况 - 每4小时(cron已配置)
2. 验证8000/8081端口服务状态 - 每30分钟(cron已配置)
3. models.json完整性 - 每小时(cron已配置)

### **🟢 低优先级任务 (每日检查)**
1. 凌晨统一维护 - 3:00(cron已配置)
2. 旧sessions清理 - 3:30(cron已配置)
3. 官方指南采集 - 9:00(cron已配置)

## ⚠ **已知风险**

### **8000端口服务保活**
- ✅ 已解决: 已建立独立systemd服务 manhua-studio-8000.service
- KillMode=process，独立cgroup，网关重启不影响

### **微信插件版本**
- 当前: v2.4.3 (2026-05-15更新)
- 旧版v2.1.8与Node.js v22.22.2的undici 6.24.1不兼容，导致getUpdates持续失败

### **mimo-v2.5模型**
- 不支持 additionalProperties/oneOf/anyOf/allOf/$ref tool schema关键字
- 不适合作为main agent模型
- main agent已切换到 arkcode/ark-code-latest

## 🚨 **告警设置**

### **使用率告警**
- 警告阈值: 85% (发微信通知)
- 关键阈值: 90% (切换到硅基模型)
- 紧急阈值: 95% (强制切换并通知)

### **质量告警**
- 任务成功率 < 95%: 检查模型性能
- Cron连续错误 > 3次: 检查任务配置
- 网关重启 > 5次/天: 检查依赖和配置

## ⚠ **禁止操作清单**
- **禁止运行 `openclaw doctor --fix`** — 会引入配置污染导致网关崩溃(5月13日/14日两次教训)
- **TAT agent应保持运行** — 它是用户远程管理服务器的唯一通道（之前的禁用是错误判断）
- 修复环境只做最小必要操作(重装依赖、手动清理)
- 任何AI工具修复后必须diff检查配置变更

## ⚠ **配置守护**
- 腾讯云Lighthouse AI可能在服务故障时修改安全配置(bind/allowInsecureAuth/dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth)
- 守护脚本: `openclaw_config_guard.sh` 监控并自动恢复
- 安全基线: bind=loopback, allowInsecureAuth=false, dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth=false

## 📋 **8000端口systemd服务**
- 服务名: `manhua-studio-8000.service`
- 工作目录: `/root/.openclaw/workspace/versions/user_driven_final_v3.0.1/manhua_studio_web_8000`
- 启动命令: `venv/bin/python -m uvicorn api_server:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000`
- 管理命令: `systemctl --user start|stop|restart|status manhua-studio-8000`
- 日志查看: `journalctl --user -u manhua-studio-8000 -f`
Current time: Thursday, May 21st, 2026 - 12:53 PM (Asia/Shanghai)
Reference UTC: 2026-05-21 04:53 UTC


This is a heartbeat poll. I just completed a major investigation in the previous turns, so I need to check if anything needs attention now vs. just replying HEARTBEAT_OK.

Key things to check:
1. HEARTBEAT.md mentions several items, but many are outdated (references to May 16/18 events)
2. I just completed fixing two critical root causes - that's fresh context
3. Need to do a quick health check per the heartbeat guidelines

Let me do a quick status check and see if anything needs immediate attention.

# 快速健康检查
systemctl --user is-active openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null
systemctl --user is-active manhua-studio-8000 2>/dev/null
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -L http://127.0.0.1:8000/ 2>/dev/null
echo ""
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js && echo "zod:OK" || echo "zod:CORRUPTED"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js && echo "ajv:OK" || echo "ajv:CORRUPTED"
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | wc -l
df -h / | awk 'NR==2{print $5}'
python3 -c "import json; c=json.load(open('/root/.openclaw/openclaw.json')); gw=c.get('gateway',{}); print(f'bind={gw.get(\"bind\")}, insecure={gw.get(\"controlUi\",{}).get(\"allowInsecureAuth\")}, noAuth={gw.get(\"controlUi\",{}).get(\"dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth\")}')"


active
active
200
zod:OK
ajv:OK
0
71%
bind=lan, insecure=True, noAuth=True


安全配置又被腾讯云改了，但用户明确说不需要调整（通过腾讯面板访问需要bind=lan）。其余全部正常。

HEARTBEAT_OK


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
When reading HEARTBEAT.md, use workspace file /root/.openclaw/workspace/HEARTBEAT.md (exact case). Do not read docs/heartbeat.md.

Additional context from HEARTBEAT.md:
# HEARTBEAT.md - 智能任务检查

**最后更新**: 2026-05-18 09:35

## 🟢 **三大根因问题已彻底解决 (2026-05-18)**

### 1. ✅ 8000端口systemd服务
- 服务: `manhua-studio-8000.service` (enabled + active)
- 网关重启不再影响8000端口

### 2. ✅ TAT agent保持运行
- `tat_agent.service`: enabled + active
- 腾讯云Lighthouse AI在服务故障时自动介入，会修改安全配置
- 已建立配置守护脚本自动恢复安全配置
- **真正根因**: 磁盘/文件系统问题导致zod/venv文件损坏，腾讯云AI只是响应性地修复

### 3. ✅ Python venv已重建
- 72个空.py文件问题已修复
- 核心依赖已重新安装

## 🔴 **今日重大事件 (2026-05-16)**

### 腾讯云AI第三次修复引入问题
- 腾讯云TAT agent远程执行了 `pnpm remove -g openclaw` + `pnpm install -g openclaw@latest --force` + `openclaw doctor`
- doctor --fix 这次没有写入配置污染（网关在运行中阻止了写入）
- 但zod@4.4.3/core.js再次损坏，网关崩溃约15分钟
- Python venv也出现模块损坏（click.core、pip._vendor.certifi.core等29个空.py文件）

### 根因分析结论
- **pnpm package-import-method=copy**：所有文件都是独立副本，没有store硬链接保护
- **磁盘空间压力**：78%→69%（清理3.5GB后），高磁盘使用可能导致写入不完整
- **腾讯云TAT agent**：远程执行修复命令可能造成并发写入冲突
- **系统性损坏模式**：Node.js(pnpm)和Python(venv)同时出现模块损坏，指向底层磁盘/文件系统问题

### 已清理磁盘空间
- ✅ 删除旧备份 2.4GB (`/root/.openclaw-backups/20260515_085944/`)
- ✅ 删除旧版openclaw-run 1.1GB (`/root/openclaw-run/`)
- ✅ 重建Python venv（29个空文件修复）
- ✅ 重启8000端口服务

### 待办
- [ ] 清理 `/root/data/disk/openclaw-sessions-archive/` 1.5GB
- [ ] 清理 `/root/data/disk/projects/` 720MB
- [ ] 将pnpm package-import-method改为hardlink
- [ ] 禁用腾讯云TAT agent的自动修复
- [ ] 建立8000端口systemd服务（防止被网关重启杀死）

## 🎯 **任务优先级**

### **🔴 高优先级任务 (立即检查)**
1. 检查微信通知通道状态 - openclaw-weixin v2.4.3 ✅
2. 监控磁盘使用率 - 当前69%（警告线85%）✅ 已从78%降至69%
3. 验证网关systemd服务状态 - 当前active ✅
4. 检查8000端口服务是否存活 - 需关注（易被网关重启杀死）

### **🟡 中优先级任务 (定期检查)**
1. 检查火山套餐使用情况 - 每4小时(cron已配置)
2. 验证8000/8081端口服务状态 - 每30分钟(cron已配置)
3. models.json完整性 - 每小时(cron已配置)

### **🟢 低优先级任务 (每日检查)**
1. 凌晨统一维护 - 3:00(cron已配置)
2. 旧sessions清理 - 3:30(cron已配置)
3. 官方指南采集 - 9:00(cron已配置)

## ⚠ **已知风险**

### **8000端口服务保活**
- ✅ 已解决: 已建立独立systemd服务 manhua-studio-8000.service
- KillMode=process，独立cgroup，网关重启不影响

### **微信插件版本**
- 当前: v2.4.3 (2026-05-15更新)
- 旧版v2.1.8与Node.js v22.22.2的undici 6.24.1不兼容，导致getUpdates持续失败

### **mimo-v2.5模型**
- 不支持 additionalProperties/oneOf/anyOf/allOf/$ref tool schema关键字
- 不适合作为main agent模型
- main agent已切换到 arkcode/ark-code-latest

## 🚨 **告警设置**

### **使用率告警**
- 警告阈值: 85% (发微信通知)
- 关键阈值: 90% (切换到硅基模型)
- 紧急阈值: 95% (强制切换并通知)

### **质量告警**
- 任务成功率 < 95%: 检查模型性能
- Cron连续错误 > 3次: 检查任务配置
- 网关重启 > 5次/天: 检查依赖和配置

## ⚠ **禁止操作清单**
- **禁止运行 `openclaw doctor --fix`** — 会引入配置污染导致网关崩溃(5月13日/14日两次教训)
- **TAT agent应保持运行** — 它是用户远程管理服务器的唯一通道（之前的禁用是错误判断）
- 修复环境只做最小必要操作(重装依赖、手动清理)
- 任何AI工具修复后必须diff检查配置变更

## ⚠ **配置守护**
- 腾讯云Lighthouse AI可能在服务故障时修改安全配置(bind/allowInsecureAuth/dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth)
- 守护脚本: `openclaw_config_guard.sh` 监控并自动恢复
- 安全基线: bind=loopback, allowInsecureAuth=false, dangerouslyDisableDeviceAuth=false

## 📋 **8000端口systemd服务**
- 服务名: `manhua-studio-8000.service`
- 工作目录: `/root/.openclaw/workspace/versions/user_driven_final_v3.0.1/manhua_studio_web_8000`
- 启动命令: `venv/bin/python -m uvicorn api_server:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000`
- 管理命令: `systemctl --user start|stop|restart|status manhua-studio-8000`
- 日志查看: `journalctl --user -u manhua-studio-8000 -f`
Current time: Thursday, May 21st, 2026 - 1:13 PM (Asia/Shanghai)
Reference UTC: 2026-05-21 05:13 UTC


The heartbeat is asking me to check on things. Let me do a quick health check based on what matters right now, especially given the major findings from today's investigation.

Key things to check:
1. Gateway and 8000 port status
2. zod/ajv module integrity (we just fixed the root cause)
3. Disk usage
4. The cron job fix we just made - did it take effect?

Let me do a quick check.

# 快速健康检查
systemctl --user is-active openclaw-gateway 2>/dev/null
systemctl --user is-active manhua-studio-8000 2>/dev/null
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -L http://127.0.0.1:8000/
echo
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/zod@4.4.3/node_modules/zod/v4/core/core.js && echo "zod:OK" || echo "zod:CORRUPTED"
test -s /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm/ajv@8.20.0/node_modules/ajv/dist/core.js && echo "ajv:OK" || echo "ajv:CORRUPTED"
find /root/.local/share/pnpm/global/5/.pnpm -name "*.js" -empty 2>/dev/null | wc -l
df -h / | awk 'NR==2{print $5}'
# 确认cron job修复已生效
grep "find / -name.*core.*-delete" /root/.openclaw/cron/jobs.json 2>/dev/null | grep -v "绝对禁止" | grep -v "⚠" | wc -l


active
active
200
zod:OK
ajv:OK
0
71%
0


一切正常。刚完成的核心修复已验证：

- zod/ajv模块完整，0个空文件
- 网关+8000端口均active
- 磁盘71%
- `find / -name "core.*" -delete` 已从cron维护任务中移除（0条危险引用）

HEARTBEAT_OK